Literature DB >> 20218588

Isotope fractionation of mercury during its photochemical reduction by low-molecular-weight organic compounds.

Wang Zheng1, Holger Hintelmann.   

Abstract

Photochemical reduction of Hg(II) by various low-molecular-weight organic compounds (LMWOC) was investigated to evaluate the effect of specific functional groups that are typically encountered in natural dissolved organic matters (DOM) on the photoreactivity and isotope fractionation of Hg. LMWOC with reduced sulfur functional groups (e.g., cysteine, glutathione) resulted in slower photochemical reduction of Hg(II) than those without reduced sulfur groups (e.g., serine, oxalic acid). Reduction rate constants were specifically determined for two contrasting LMWOC: dl-serine (0.640 h(-1)) and l-cysteine (0.047 h(-1)). Different mass independent isotope effects of Hg were induced by the two types of LMWOC. S-containing ligands specifically enriched magnetic isotopes ((199)Hg and (201)Hg) in the product (Hg(0)) while sulfurless ligands enriched (199)Hg and (201)Hg in the reactant (Hg(II)), suggesting that opposite magnetic isotope effects were produced by different types of ligands. The nuclear field shift effect was also observed in the photochemical reduction by serine. These isotope effects are related to specific functional groups and reduction mechanisms, and may be used to distinguish between primary and secondary photochemical reduction mechanisms of Hg(II) and to explain isotope fractionation during the photochemical reduction of Hg(II) by natural DOM, which provides mixed bonding conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20218588     DOI: 10.1021/jp9111348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  6 in total

1.  Resolving Atmospheric Mercury Loading and Source Trends from Isotopic Records of Remote North American Lake Sediments.

Authors:  Ryan F Lepak; Sarah E Janssen; Daniel R Engstrom; David P Krabbenhoft; Michael T Tate; Runsheng Yin; William F Fitzgerald; Sonia A Nagorski; James P Hurley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Mercury isotope signatures record photic zone euxinia in the Mesoproterozoic ocean.

Authors:  Wang Zheng; Geoffrey J Gilleaudeau; Linda C Kah; Ariel D Anbar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Examining historical mercury sources in the Saint Louis River estuary: How legacy contamination influences biological mercury levels in Great Lakes coastal regions.

Authors:  Sarah E Janssen; Joel C Hoffman; Ryan F Lepak; David P Krabbenhoft; David Walters; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Greg Peterson; Jacob M Ogorek; John F DeWild; Anne Cotter; Mark Pearson; Michael T Tate; Roger B Yeardley; Marc A Mills
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 10.753

4.  Linking mercury, carbon, and nitrogen stable isotopes in Tibetan biota: Implications for using mercury stable isotopes as source tracers.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Xu; Qianggong Zhang; Wen-Xiong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Mercury Isotopes as Proxies to Identify Sources and Environmental Impacts of Mercury in Sphalerites.

Authors:  Runsheng Yin; Xinbin Feng; James P Hurley; David P Krabbenhoft; Ryan F Lepak; Ruizhong Hu; Qian Zhang; Zhonggen Li; Xianwu Bi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Assessing sources of human methylmercury exposure using stable mercury isotopes.

Authors:  Miling Li; Laura S Sherman; Joel D Blum; Philippe Grandjean; Bjarni Mikkelsen; Pál Weihe; Elsie M Sunderland; James P Shine
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.