BACKGROUND: Since the publication of the DSM-IV in 1994, research on obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has continued to expand. It is timely to reconsider the nosology of this disorder, assessing whether changes to diagnostic criteria as well as subtypes and specifiers may improve diagnostic validity and clinical utility. METHODS: The existing criteria were evaluated. Key issues were identified. Electronic databases of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. RESULTS: This review presents a number of options and preliminary recommendations to be considered for DSM-V. These include: (1) clarifying and simplifying the definition of obsessions and compulsions (criterion A); (2) possibly deleting the requirement that people recognize that their obsessions or compulsions are excessive or unreasonable (criterion B); (3) rethinking the clinical significance criterion (criterion C) and, in the interim, possibly adjusting what is considered "time-consuming" for OCD; (4) listing additional disorders to help with the differential diagnosis (criterion D); (5) rethinking the medical exclusion criterion (criterion E) and clarifying what is meant by a "general medical condition"; (6) revising the specifiers (i.e., clarifying that OCD can involve a range of insight, in addition to "poor insight," and adding "tic-related OCD"); and (7) highlighting in the DSM-V text important clinical features of OCD that are not currently mentioned in the criteria (e.g., the major symptom dimensions). CONCLUSIONS: A number of changes to the existing diagnostic criteria for OCD are proposed. These proposed criteria may change as the DSM-V process progresses. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Since the publication of the DSM-IV in 1994, research on obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has continued to expand. It is timely to reconsider the nosology of this disorder, assessing whether changes to diagnostic criteria as well as subtypes and specifiers may improve diagnostic validity and clinical utility. METHODS: The existing criteria were evaluated. Key issues were identified. Electronic databases of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies. RESULTS: This review presents a number of options and preliminary recommendations to be considered for DSM-V. These include: (1) clarifying and simplifying the definition of obsessions and compulsions (criterion A); (2) possibly deleting the requirement that people recognize that their obsessions or compulsions are excessive or unreasonable (criterion B); (3) rethinking the clinical significance criterion (criterion C) and, in the interim, possibly adjusting what is considered "time-consuming" for OCD; (4) listing additional disorders to help with the differential diagnosis (criterion D); (5) rethinking the medical exclusion criterion (criterion E) and clarifying what is meant by a "general medical condition"; (6) revising the specifiers (i.e., clarifying that OCD can involve a range of insight, in addition to "poor insight," and adding "tic-related OCD"); and (7) highlighting in the DSM-V text important clinical features of OCD that are not currently mentioned in the criteria (e.g., the major symptom dimensions). CONCLUSIONS: A number of changes to the existing diagnostic criteria for OCD are proposed. These proposed criteria may change as the DSM-V process progresses. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: M F Flament; A Whitaker; J L Rapoport; M Davies; C Z Berg; K Kalikow; W Sceery; D Shaffer Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1988-11 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Sîan M J Hemmings; Craig J Kinnear; Christine Lochner; Dana J H Niehaus; James A Knowles; Johanna C Moolman-Smook; Valerie A Corfield; Dan J Stein Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2004-09-30 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Katharine A Phillips; Dan J Stein; Scott L Rauch; Eric Hollander; Brian A Fallon; Arthur Barsky; Naomi Fineberg; David Mataix-Cols; Ygor Arzeno Ferrão; Sanjaya Saxena; Sabine Wilhelm; Megan M Kelly; Lee Anna Clark; Anthony Pinto; O Joseph Bienvenu; Joanne Farrow; James Leckman Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: David Mataix-Cols; Bjarne Hansen; Manuel Mattheisen; Elinor K Karlsson; Anjené M Addington; Julia Boberg; Diana R Djurfeldt; Matthew Halvorsen; Paul Lichtenstein; Stian Solem; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Jan Haavik; Gerd Kvale; Christian Rück; James J Crowley Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Henry Szechtman; Susanne E Ahmari; Richard J Beninger; David Eilam; Brian H Harvey; Henriette Edemann-Callesen; Christine Winter Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Monnica T Williams; Samantha G Farris; Eric N Turkheimer; Martin E Franklin; H Blair Simpson; Michael Liebowitz; Edna B Foa Journal: J Anxiety Disord Date: 2014-06-14
Authors: Christine A Conelea; Michael R Walther; Jennifer B Freeman; Abbe M Garcia; Jeffrey Sapyta; Muniya Khanna; Martin Franklin Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Dan J Stein; Daniel L C Costa; Christine Lochner; Euripedes C Miguel; Y C Janardhan Reddy; Roseli G Shavitt; Odile A van den Heuvel; H Blair Simpson Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 52.329