Literature DB >> 20217103

Early history of operative treatment of fractures.

Jan Bartoníček1.   

Abstract

Surgery in the first half of the nineteenth century was primarily dominated by pain and fear of lethal infections. Therefore, the absolute majority of fractures and dislocations were treated non-operatively. Development of operative treatment of fractures was influenced by three major inventions: anaesthesia (1846), antisepsis (1865) and X-rays (1895). The first to use external fixation is traditionally considered to be Malgaigne (1843). However, his devices cannot be considered as external fixation. Von der Höhe, in 1843, fixed a non-union of the femur by inserting into both fragments a couple of screws transversely connected outside the wound. Von Langenbeck in 1855 treated a non-union of the humerus with screws connected by a devise designed for this purpose. A predecessor of nailing of acute diaphyseal fractures may be considered to be fixation of diaphyseal non-unions of the femur, humerus and tibia with ivory intramedullary pegs, performed by Dieffenbach in 1846. Nevertheless, until 1885, osteosynthesis was still a Cinderella having at its disposal mainly wires, ivory pegs and very primitive types of external fixation. During the following 35 years (1886-1921), operative treatment of fractures witnessed an unprecedented revolution. Radiology became an integral part of bone and joint surgery. All types of osteosynthesis, i.e. plates (Hansmann 1886), external fixation (Parkhill 1897) and intramedullary nails (Schöne 1913) were introduced into clinical practice. Basic experiments were undertaken, surgical approaches described and the first textbooks on osteosynthesis published.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20217103     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1082-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outcome parameters in orthogeriatric co‑management - a mini-review.

Authors:  Radko Komadina; Klaus W Wendt; Gerold Holzer; Tomaž Kocjan
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Miller Edwin Preston (1879-1928); pioneer of fracture biomechanics-a biographical vignette.

Authors:  Christopher Colton; Jan Bartoníček
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  A Review on Biomaterials for Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology: From Past to Present.

Authors:  Grzegorz Szczęsny; Mateusz Kopec; Denis J Politis; Zbigniew L Kowalewski; Adam Łazarski; Tomasz Szolc
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 4.  Early history of operative treatment of patellar fractures.

Authors:  Jan Bartoníček; Stefan Rammelt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  From Dr. Miller E. Preston (1879-1928) to the Department of Orthopaedics at Denver Health Medical Center in Denver, CO.

Authors:  Francisco Rodriguez-Fontan; Andrew S Maertens; Joshua A Parry; Stephen Stacey; Alexander Lauder; Kyros Ipaktchi; Austin Heare; Michael Hadeed; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  In vitro corrosion of ZEK100 plates in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution.

Authors:  Hazibullah Waizy; Andreas Weizbauer; Christian Modrejewski; Frank Witte; Henning Windhagen; Arne Lucas; Marc Kieke; Berend Denkena; Peter Behrens; Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg; Friedrich-Wilhelm Bach; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Revisiting conservative orthopaedic management of fractures during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Iyengar; Abhishek Vaish; Raju Vaishya
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-05-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.