PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if consuming isoenergetic (25 g) doses of carbohydrate or protein versus a noncaloric placebo before conventional resistance training affected the myogenic expression of cell cycle-regulating genes as well as the muscle [DNA] acutely after exercise. METHODS:Ten untrained men (mean +/- SD: age = 22 +/- 4 yr, body mass = 77.8 +/- 8.3 kg, percent body fat = 17.8 +/- 4.0) participated in three resistance exercise sessions (three sets of 10 repetitions at 80% one-repetition maximum for the bilateral hack squat, leg press, and leg extension exercises) in a crossover fashion, which were preceded by carbohydrate, protein, or placebo ingestion 30 min before training. Presupplement/preexercise and 2- and 6-h postexercise muscle biopsies were obtained during each session and analyzed for fold changes in CDK4, CYCLIN D1, MGF, MYOD, P21(CIP1), and P27(KIP1) messenger RNA expression using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction as well as muscle [DNA] using cuvette-based fluorometric methods. RESULTS: Nonparametric statistics were completed, and no conditions x time interaction effects were revealed. Several exercise-mediated responses were found to occur independent of condition: 1) muscle [DNA] increased at 6 h (+40%, P < 0.05), 2) CDK4 expression increased at 6 h (+86%, P < 0.05), 3) MYOD expression increased at 6 h (+98%, P < 0.05), 4) P27(KIP1) expression decreased at 2 h (j35%, P < 0.05) and 6 h (-59%, P < 0.001), and 5) P21(CIP1) expression substantially increased 2 and 6 h postexercise (+1.250% and +4.670%, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The tandem DNA and cell cycle regulator gene expression analyses provide preliminary evidence to suggest that satellite cell activation and proliferation may be occurring at early post-exercise time points after a conventional resistance exercise bout, a phenomenon that may seemingly be independent of preexercise macronutrient ingestion.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if consuming isoenergetic (25 g) doses of carbohydrate or protein versus a noncaloric placebo before conventional resistance training affected the myogenic expression of cell cycle-regulating genes as well as the muscle [DNA] acutely after exercise. METHODS: Ten untrained men (mean +/- SD: age = 22 +/- 4 yr, body mass = 77.8 +/- 8.3 kg, percent body fat = 17.8 +/- 4.0) participated in three resistance exercise sessions (three sets of 10 repetitions at 80% one-repetition maximum for the bilateral hack squat, leg press, and leg extension exercises) in a crossover fashion, which were preceded by carbohydrate, protein, or placebo ingestion 30 min before training. Presupplement/preexercise and 2- and 6-h postexercise muscle biopsies were obtained during each session and analyzed for fold changes in CDK4, CYCLIN D1, MGF, MYOD, P21(CIP1), and P27(KIP1) messenger RNA expression using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction as well as muscle [DNA] using cuvette-based fluorometric methods. RESULTS: Nonparametric statistics were completed, and no conditions x time interaction effects were revealed. Several exercise-mediated responses were found to occur independent of condition: 1) muscle [DNA] increased at 6 h (+40%, P < 0.05), 2) CDK4 expression increased at 6 h (+86%, P < 0.05), 3) MYOD expression increased at 6 h (+98%, P < 0.05), 4) P27(KIP1) expression decreased at 2 h (j35%, P < 0.05) and 6 h (-59%, P < 0.001), and 5) P21(CIP1) expression substantially increased 2 and 6 h postexercise (+1.250% and +4.670%, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The tandem DNA and cell cycle regulator gene expression analyses provide preliminary evidence to suggest that satellite cell activation and proliferation may be occurring at early post-exercise time points after a conventional resistance exercise bout, a phenomenon that may seemingly be independent of preexercise macronutrient ingestion.
Authors: Dillon K Walker; Christopher S Fry; Micah J Drummond; Jared M Dickinson; Kyle L Timmerman; David M Gundermann; Kristofer Jennings; Elena Volpi; Blake B Rasmussen Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Aaron L Baggish; Andrew Hale; Rory B Weiner; Gregory D Lewis; David Systrom; Francis Wang; Thomas J Wang; Stephen Y Chan Journal: J Physiol Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Matthew M Robinson; Scott M Turner; Marc K Hellerstein; Karyn L Hamilton; Benjamin F Miller Journal: FASEB J Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Andrew S Layne; Kelly Larkin-Kaiser; R Gavin MacNeil; Marvin Dirain; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Todd M Manini; Thomas W Buford Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: Michael D Roberts; Vincent J Dalbo; Kyle L Sunderland; Chris N Poole; Scott E Hassell; Debra Bemben; Joel Cramer; Jeff Stout; Chad M Kerksick Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2010-07-29 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Ryan G Toedebusch; Thomas E Childs; Shari R Hamilton; Jan R Crowley; Frank W Booth; Michael D Roberts Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: C Brooks Mobley; Troy A Hornberger; Carlton D Fox; James C Healy; Brian S Ferguson; Ryan P Lowery; Rachel M McNally; Christopher M Lockwood; Jeffrey R Stout; Andreas N Kavazis; Jacob M Wilson; Michael D Roberts Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2015-08-16 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Alec I McKenzie; Andrew C D'Lugos; Michael J Saunders; Keith D Gworek; Nicholas D Luden Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 4.566