Literature DB >> 20216435

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of velopharyngeal structures in Chinese children after primary palatal repair.

Wei Tian1, Heng Yin, Yang Li, Shufan Zhao, Qian Zheng, Bing Shi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) after primary palatal repair remains a persistent problem despite advanced surgical techniques. Velopharyngeal inadequacy has significant negative impacts on patients' speech intelligibility and quality. Previous studies have produced conflicting results regarding the causes of VPI, which are likely due to limitations in two-dimensional imaging techniques used as well as failure to include matched groups with repaired cleft palate and differing velopharyngeal outcome. The present study aimed to investigate the characteristics of the velopharyngeal structures, including the levator veli palatini muscles, in children with repaired cleft palate and different speech outcomes.
METHODS: A prescan training was performed to help the child participants to finish scans successfully without general anesthesia. Multiple high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging scans covering the whole head and focusing on the velopharyngeal region, including the levator veli palatini muscles, were acquired in 3 matched groups of young children: children with cleft palate and VPI, children with cleft palate and adequate velopharyngeal closure, and children without cleft palate.
RESULTS: There were few significant differences between the 2 groups with cleft palate, although the functional pharyngeal dimensions were slightly greater in the children with VPI. More significant differences were found between the children with cleft palate and the control subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic characteristics of the velopharyngeal structures may be slightly less advantageous for velopharyngeal closure in children with VPI after palatal repair, but these structural differences alone cannot explain VPI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20216435     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d08bd1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  10 in total

1.  Asymmetry and Positioning of the Levator Veli Palatini Muscle in Children With Repaired Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Katelyn J Kotlarek; Catherine M Pelland; Silvia S Blemker; Michael S Jaskolka; Xiangming Fang; Jamie L Perry
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Nonsedated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Visualization of the Velopharynx in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Katelyn J Kotlarek; Thomas J Sitzman; Jessica L Williams; Jamie L Perry
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-11-17

3.  Examining Velopharyngeal Closure Patterns Based on Anatomic Variables.

Authors:  Holly Nelson Jordan; Graham C Schenck; Charles Ellis; Balaji Rangarathnam; Xiangming Fang; Jamie L Perry
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Racial Variations in Velopharyngeal and Craniometric Morphology in Children: An Imaging Study.

Authors:  Lakshmi Kollara; Jamie L Perry; Suzanne Hudson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Sexual dimorphism of the levator veli palatini muscle: an imaging study.

Authors:  Jamie L Perry; David P Kuehn; Bradley P Sutton; Jinadasa K Gamage
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2013-06-19

6.  Examining age, sex, and race characteristics of velopharyngeal structures in 4- to 9-year old children using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jamie L Perry; Lakshmi Kollara; David P Kuehn; Bradley P Sutton; Xiangming Fang
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2017-12-14

7.  Study of relationship between clinical factors and velopharyngeal closure in cleft palate patients.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Qian Zheng; Bing Shi; Heng Yin; Tian Meng; Guang-Ning Zheng
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  A Preliminary Study of Anatomical Changes Following the Use of a Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Flap During Primary Palatoplasty.

Authors:  Katelyn J Kotlarek; Michael S Jaskolka; Xiangming Fang; Charles Ellis; Silvia S Blemker; Bruce Horswell; Paul Kloostra; Jamie L Perry
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-05-11

Review 9.  Three-dimensional imaging methods for quantitative analysis of facial soft tissues and skeletal morphology in patients with orofacial clefts: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mette A R Kuijpers; Yu-Ting Chiu; Rania M Nada; Carine E L Carels; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Wnt7a induces satellite cell expansion, myofiber hyperplasia and hypertrophy in rat craniofacial muscle.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Hanyao Huang; Xiangyou Luo; Bing Shi; Jingtao Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.