Literature DB >> 20215903

Regional differences in quality of care and outcomes for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the get with the guidelines coronary artery disease program.

Warren Laskey1, Nathan Spence, Xin Zhao, Rebecca Mayo, Robert Taylor, Christopher P Cannon, Adrian F Hernandez, Eric D Peterson, Gregg C Fonarow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Geographic differences in the delivery of guideline-driven care following acute myocardial infarction have been described. The effect of hospital participation in a national performance improvement program on regional variation in quality of care and in-hospital outcomes for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unknown.
METHODS: We evaluated the variation in conformity to the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease Program quality measures across 4 geographic regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, and East) in 161,236 patients admitted for ACS to 436 Get With The Guidelines hospitals. We evaluated 6 measures (aspirin within 24 hours, aspirin at discharge, ACEI or ARB therapy for left ventricular systolic dysfunction, beta-blocker at discharge, lipid-lowering medication for qualified patients, smoking cessation advice); a binary "all-or-none" process performance measure (primary outcome); an "opportunity-based" overall composite score (secondary outcome); in-hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to test the associations between performance measures and short-term outcomes and geographic region.
RESULTS: Data were collected from January 2, 2000 to January 2, 2008. There was no significant regional variation in either the "all-or-none" (Northeast: 79.3%; Midwest: 83.2%; South: 78.9%; West: 81.6%) or "opportunity-based" (Northeast: 91.9%; Midwest: 93.6%; South: 91.5%; West: 92.6%) composite performance measures. Both performance measures exhibited significant improvement with participation time irrespective of region. In-hospital mortality was similar among regions. Adjusted hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the Midwest.
CONCLUSION: Quality improvement program participation may help to facilitate high quality, consistent care for patients with ACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20215903     DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181cdb5a5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol        ISSN: 1535-2811


  11 in total

1.  Assessing Community Quality of Health Care.

Authors:  Jeph Herrin; Kevin Kenward; Maulik S Joshi; Anne-Marie J Audet; Stephen J Hines
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Implementation of the HEART Pathway: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Authors:  Sabina B Gesell; Shannon L Golden; Alexander T Limkakeng; Christine M Carr; Andrew Matuskowitz; Lane M Smith; Simon A Mahler
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2018-12

3.  Using spatial analysis to demonstrate the heterogeneity of the cardiovascular drug-prescribing pattern in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ching-Lan Cheng; Yi-Chi Chen; Tzu-Ming Liu; Yea-Huei Kao Yang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Regional Variation in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Shannon M Dunlay; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard J Gersh; Charanjit S Rihal; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 5.  A review of geographic variation and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications in prescription drug use research.

Authors:  Victoria Wangia; Theresa I Shireman
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2013-01-18

6.  Geographic and racial variation in premature mortality in the U.S.: analyzing the disparities.

Authors:  Mark R Cullen; Clint Cummins; Victor R Fuchs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Composite measures of quality of health care: Evidence mapping of methodology and reporting.

Authors:  Pinar Kara; Jan Brink Valentin; Jan Mainz; Søren Paaske Johnsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  'Who does this patient belong to?' boundary work and the re/making of (NSTEMI) heart attack patients.

Authors:  Helen Cramer; Jacki Hughes; Rachel Johnson; Maggie Evans; Christi Deaton; Adam Timmis; Harry Hemingway; Gene Feder; Katie Featherstone
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2018-06-28

9.  Regional variations in the process of care for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Shoji; Kyohei Yamaji; Alexander T Sandhu; Nobuhiro Ikemura; Yasuyuki Shiraishi; Taku Inohara; Paul A Heidenreich; Tetsuya Amano; Yuji Ikari; Shun Kohsaka
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-03-15

10.  Patient and hospital determinants of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in England, 2003-2013.

Authors:  M Hall; K Laut; T B Dondo; O A Alabas; R A Brogan; N Gutacker; R Cookson; P Norman; A Timmis; M de Belder; P F Ludman; C P Gale
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.