Literature DB >> 20215815

A nomogram predicting prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy.

Christopher R Porter1, Nazareno Suardi, Umberto Capitanio, Georg C Hutterer, Koichi Kodama, Robert P Gibbons, Roy Correa, Paul Perrotte, Francesco Montorsi, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We describe a model capable of predicting prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality up to 20 years after a radical prostatectomy (RP), which can adjust the predictions according to disease-free interval. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 752 patients were treated with RP for organ-confined PCa. Cox regression modeled the probability of PCa-specific mortality. The significance of the predictors was confirmed in competing risks analyses, which account for other-cause mortality.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 11.4 years. The 5-, 10-, 15- and 20-year actuarial rates of PCa-specific survival were 99.0, 95.5, 90.9 and 85.7%, respectively. RP Gleason sum (p < 0.001), pT stage (p = 0.007), adjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.03) and age at RP (p = 0.004) represented independent predictors of PCa-specific mortality in the Cox regression model as well as in competing risks regression. Those variables, along with lymph node dissection status (p = 0.4), constituted the nomogram predictors. After 200 bootstrap resamples, the nomogram achieved 82.6, 83.8, 75.0 and 76.3% accuracy in predicting PCa-specific mortality at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-RP, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: At 20 years, roughly 20% of men treated with RP may succumb to PCa. The current nomogram helps to identify these individuals. Their follow-up or secondary therapies may be adjusted according to nomogram predictions. Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20215815     DOI: 10.1159/000277588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  7 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic Value of Standard Versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michele Colicchia; Vidit Sharma; Firas Abdollah; Alberto Briganti; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Development of ProCaRS Clinical Nomograms for Biochemical Failure-free Survival Following Either Low-Dose Rate Brachytherapy or Conventionally Fractionated External Beam Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Warner; Tom Pickles; Juanita Crook; Andre-Guy Martin; Luis Souhami; Charles Catton; Himu Lukka; George Rodrigues
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-06-11

3.  Prognostic model for predicting overall survival in children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Limin Yang; Tetsuya Takimoto; Junichiro Fujimoto
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 4.  THE ROLE OF LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS.

Authors:  Dean Markić; Romano Oguić; Kristian Krpina; Ivan Vukelić; Gordana Đorđević; Iva Žuža; Josip Španjol
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.780

5.  Are preoperative Kattan and Stephenson nomograms predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy applicable in the Chinese population?

Authors:  Victor H W Yeung; Yi Chiu; Sylvia S Y Yu; W H Au; Steve W H Chan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-03-05

6.  Prognostic models to predict overall and cause-specific survival for patients with middle ear cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Weidong Shen; Naoko Sakamoto; Limin Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Population-based study evaluating and predicting the probability of death resulting from thyroid cancer among patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Jing Xu; Shuyu Li; Shiyang Liu; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.