PURPOSE: Aberrant expression of inflammatory molecules, such as inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS), has been linked to cancer, suggesting that their inhibition is a rational therapeutic approach. Whereas iNOS expression in melanoma and other cancers is associated with poor clinical prognosis, in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that iNOS and NO can have both protumor and antitumor effects. We tested the hypothesis that targeted iNOS inhibition would interfere with human melanoma growth and survival in vivo in a preclinical model. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used an immunodeficient non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient xenograft model to test the susceptibility of two different human melanoma lines to the orally-given iNOS-selective small molecule antagonist N(6)-(1-iminoethyl)-l-lysine-dihydrochloride (L-nil) with and without cytotoxic cisplatin chemotherapy. RESULTS: L-nil significantly inhibited melanoma growth and extended the survival of tumor-bearing mice. L-nil treatment decreased the density of CD31+ microvessels and increased the number of apoptotic cells in tumor xenografts. Proteomic analysis of melanoma xenografts with reverse-phase protein array identified alterations in the expression of multiple cell signaling and survival genes after L-nil treatment. The canonical antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 was downregulated in vivo and in vitro after L-nil treatment, which was associated with increased susceptibility to cisplatin-mediated tumor death. Consistent with this observation, combination therapy with L-nil plus cisplatin in vivo was more effective than either drug alone, without increased toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that iNOS and iNOS-derived NO support tumor growth in vivo and provide convincing preclinical validation of targeted iNOS inhibition as therapy for solid tumors.
PURPOSE: Aberrant expression of inflammatory molecules, such as inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS), has been linked to cancer, suggesting that their inhibition is a rational therapeutic approach. Whereas iNOS expression in melanoma and other cancers is associated with poor clinical prognosis, in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that iNOS and NO can have both protumor and antitumor effects. We tested the hypothesis that targeted iNOS inhibition would interfere with humanmelanoma growth and survival in vivo in a preclinical model. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used an immunodeficient non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient xenograft model to test the susceptibility of two different humanmelanoma lines to the orally-given iNOS-selective small molecule antagonist N(6)-(1-iminoethyl)-l-lysine-dihydrochloride (L-nil) with and without cytotoxic cisplatin chemotherapy. RESULTS:L-nil significantly inhibited melanoma growth and extended the survival of tumor-bearing mice. L-nil treatment decreased the density of CD31+ microvessels and increased the number of apoptotic cells in tumor xenografts. Proteomic analysis of melanoma xenografts with reverse-phase protein array identified alterations in the expression of multiple cell signaling and survival genes after L-nil treatment. The canonical antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 was downregulated in vivo and in vitro after L-nil treatment, which was associated with increased susceptibility to cisplatin-mediated tumor death. Consistent with this observation, combination therapy with L-nil plus cisplatin in vivo was more effective than either drug alone, without increased toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that iNOS and iNOS-derived NO support tumor growth in vivo and provide convincing preclinical validation of targeted iNOS inhibition as therapy for solid tumors.
Authors: Douglas D Thomas; Katrina M Miranda; Carol A Colton; Deborah Citrin; Michael Graham Espey; David A Wink Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: S Ekmekcioglu; J Ellerhorst; C M Smid; V G Prieto; M Munsell; A C Buzaid; E A Grimm Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: T Hatanaka; T Nakanishi; W Huang; F H Leibach; P D Prasad; V Ganapathy; M E Ganapathy Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: D Massi; A Franchi; I Sardi; L Magnelli; M Paglierani; L Borgognoni; U Maria Reali; M Santucci Journal: J Pathol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Matti J Pukkila; Jari K Kellokoski; Jukka A Virtaniemi; Eero J Kumpulainen; Risto T Johansson; Pirjo M Halonen; Ari S T Kosunen; Juhani Nuutinen; Veli-Matti Kosma Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Trevor T Hansel; Sergei A Kharitonov; Louise E Donnelly; Edward M Erin; Mark G Currie; William M Moore; Pamela T Manning; David P Recker; Peter J Barnes Journal: FASEB J Date: 2003-05-08 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Verena Fetz; Carolin Bier; Negusse Habtemichael; Robert Schuon; Andrea Schweitzer; Martin Kunkel; Knut Engels; Adorján F Kovács; Sandra Schneider; Wolf Mann; Roland H Stauber; Shirley K Knauer Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Mohamed S Nafie; Noha M Awad; Hend M Tag; Ibrahim M Abd El-Salam; Mohamed K Diab; Sahar A El-Shatoury Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Birandra K Sinha; Ashutosh Kumar; Suchandra Bhattacharjee; Michael G Espey; Ronald P Mason Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 4.030