PURPOSE: The concentration of estradiol (E(2)) in breast tumors is significantly higher than that in plasma, particularly in postmenopausal women. The contribution of local E(2) synthesis versus uptake of E(2) from the circulation is controversial. Our aim was to identify possible determinants of intratumoral E(2) levels in breast cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of genes involved in estrogen synthesis, metabolism, and signaling was measured in 34 matched samples of breast tumor and normal breast tissue, and their correlation with estrogen concentrations assessed. RESULTS: ESR1 (9.1-fold; P < 0.001) and HSD17B7 (3.5-fold; P < 0.001) were upregulated in ER(+) tumors compared with normal tissues, whereas STS (0.34-fold; P < 0.001) and HSD17B5 (0.23-fold; P < 0.001) were downregulated. Intratumoral E(2) levels showed a strong positive correlation with ESR1 expression in all patients (Spearman r = 0.55, P < 0.001) and among the subgroups of postmenopausal (r = 0.76, P < 0.001; n = 23) and postmenopausal ER(+) patients (r = 0.59, P = 0.013; n = 17). HSD17B7 expression showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.59, P < 0.001) whereas HSD17B2 (r = -0.46, P = 0.0057) and HSD17B12 (r = -0.45, P = 0.0076) showed significant negative correlations with intratumoral E(2) in all patients. Intratumoral E(2) revealed no correlation to CYP19, STS, and HSD17B1 expression. Multivariate models comprising ESR1 and plasma E(2) predicted between 50% and 70% of intratumoral E(2) variability. CONCLUSION: Uptake due to binding to the ER, rather than intratumoral estrogen synthesis by aromatase or sulfatase, is the single most important correlate and a probable determinant of intratumoral E(2). An increased expression of HSD17B7 may explain the increased ratio of E(2) to estrone (E(1)) in breast tumors compared with normal tissue.
PURPOSE: The concentration of estradiol (E(2)) in breast tumors is significantly higher than that in plasma, particularly in postmenopausal women. The contribution of local E(2) synthesis versus uptake of E(2) from the circulation is controversial. Our aim was to identify possible determinants of intratumoral E(2) levels in breast cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of genes involved in estrogen synthesis, metabolism, and signaling was measured in 34 matched samples of breast tumor and normal breast tissue, and their correlation with estrogen concentrations assessed. RESULTS: ESR1 (9.1-fold; P < 0.001) and HSD17B7 (3.5-fold; P < 0.001) were upregulated in ER(+) tumors compared with normal tissues, whereas STS (0.34-fold; P < 0.001) and HSD17B5 (0.23-fold; P < 0.001) were downregulated. Intratumoral E(2) levels showed a strong positive correlation with ESR1 expression in all patients (Spearman r = 0.55, P < 0.001) and among the subgroups of postmenopausal (r = 0.76, P < 0.001; n = 23) and postmenopausal ER(+) patients (r = 0.59, P = 0.013; n = 17). HSD17B7 expression showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.59, P < 0.001) whereas HSD17B2 (r = -0.46, P = 0.0057) and HSD17B12 (r = -0.45, P = 0.0076) showed significant negative correlations with intratumoral E(2) in all patients. Intratumoral E(2) revealed no correlation to CYP19, STS, and HSD17B1 expression. Multivariate models comprising ESR1 and plasma E(2) predicted between 50% and 70% of intratumoral E(2) variability. CONCLUSION: Uptake due to binding to the ER, rather than intratumoral estrogen synthesis by aromatase or sulfatase, is the single most important correlate and a probable determinant of intratumoral E(2). An increased expression of HSD17B7 may explain the increased ratio of E(2) to estrone (E(1)) in breast tumors compared with normal tissue.
Authors: Richard J Santen; D Craig Allred; Stacy P Ardoin; David F Archer; Norman Boyd; Glenn D Braunstein; Henry G Burger; Graham A Colditz; Susan R Davis; Marco Gambacciani; Barbara A Gower; Victor W Henderson; Wael N Jarjour; Richard H Karas; Michael Kleerekoper; Roger A Lobo; JoAnn E Manson; Jo Marsden; Kathryn A Martin; Lisa Martin; JoAnn V Pinkerton; David R Rubinow; Helena Teede; Diane M Thiboutot; Wulf H Utian Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-06-21 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Roni T Falk; Elisabet Gentzschein; Frank Z Stanczyk; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Jonine D Figueroa; Olga B Ioffe; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A Brinton; Mark E Sherman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Edgar S Díaz-Cruz; Yasuro Sugimoto; G Ian Gallicano; Robert W Brueggemeier; Priscilla A Furth Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Mengting Chen; Yang Zhao; Xueli Yang; Yuanyuan Zhao; Qiqi Liu; Yang Liu; Yifeng Hou; Hefen Sun; Wei Jin Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 4.872