Literature DB >> 20215063

Healing of non-displaced fractures produced by fatigue loading of the mouse ulna.

Mario D Martinez1, Gregory J Schmid, Jennifer A McKenzie, David M Ornitz, Matthew J Silva.   

Abstract

We developed a fatigue loading protocol in mice to produce a non-displaced ulnar fracture in vivo, and characterized the early healing response. Using adult (5 month) C57Bl/6 mice, we first determined that cyclic compression of the forelimb under load-control leads to increasing applied displacement and, eventually, complete fracture. We then subjected the right forelimbs of 80 mice to cyclic loading (2 Hz; peak force approximately 4N) and limited the displacement increase to 0.75 mm (60% of the average displacement increase at complete fracture). This fatigue protocol created a partial, non-displaced fracture through the medial cortex near the ulnar mid-shaft, and reduced ulnar strength and stiffness by >50%. Within 1 day, there was significant upregulation of genes related to hypoxia (Hif1a) and osteogenesis (Bmp2, Bsp) in loaded ulnae compared to non-loaded, contralateral controls. The gene expression response peaked in magnitude near day 7 (e.g., Osx upregulated 8-fold), and included upregulation of FGF-family genes (e.g., Fgfr3 up 6-fold). Histologically, a localized periosteal response was seen at the site of the fracture; by day 7 there was abundant periosteal woven bone surrounding a region of cartilage. From days 7 to 14, the woven bone became denser but did not increase in area. By day 14, the woven-bone response resulted in complete recovery of ulnar strength and stiffness, restoring mechanical properties to normal levels. In the future, the fatigue loading approach can be used create non-displaced bone fractures in transgenic and knockout mice to study the mechanisms by which the skeleton rapidly repairs damage. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20215063      PMCID: PMC2875275          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  40 in total

1.  Genetic variation in the patterns of skeletal progenitor cell differentiation and progression during endochondral bone formation affects the rate of fracture healing.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Christopher Price; Lee J Silkman; Fred H Nicholls; Phillip Nasser; Bin Hu; Nicole Hadi; Michael Alapatt; Stephanie N Stapleton; Sanjeev Kakar; Thomas A Einhorn; Louis C Gerstenfeld
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Cartilage-derived retinoic acid-sensitive protein and type II collagen expression during fracture healing are potential targets for Sox9 regulation.

Authors:  S Sakano; Y Zhu; L J Sandell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Fibroblast growth factor expression during skeletal fracture healing in mice.

Authors:  Gregory J Schmid; Chikashi Kobayashi; Linda J Sandell; David M Ornitz
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Stress fracture healing: fatigue loading of the rat ulna induces upregulation in expression of osteogenic and angiogenic genes that mimic the intramembranous portion of fracture repair.

Authors:  Gregory R Wohl; Dwight A Towler; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Temporal pattern of gene expression and histology of stress fracture healing.

Authors:  L J Kidd; A S Stephens; J S Kuliwaba; N L Fazzalari; A C K Wu; M R Forwood
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Molecular mechanisms controlling bone formation during fracture healing and distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Z S Ai-Aql; A S Alagl; D T Graves; L C Gerstenfeld; T A Einhorn
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Functional adaptation to loading of a single bone is neuronally regulated and involves multiple bones.

Authors:  Susannah J Sample; Mary Behan; Lesley Smith; William E Oldenhoff; Mark D Markel; Vicki L Kalscheur; Zhengling Hao; Vjekoslav Miletic; Peter Muir
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Fixation compliance in a mouse osteotomy model induces two different processes of bone healing but does not lead to delayed union.

Authors:  Ina Gröngröft; Petra Heil; Romano Matthys; Patrick Lezuo; Andrea Tami; Stephan Perren; Pierre Montavon; Keita Ito
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha pathway accelerates bone regeneration.

Authors:  Chao Wan; Shawn R Gilbert; Ying Wang; Xuemei Cao; Xing Shen; Girish Ramaswamy; Kimberly A Jacobsen; Zainab S Alaql; Alan W Eberhardt; Louis C Gerstenfeld; Thomas A Einhorn; Lianfu Deng; Thomas L Clemens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Functional adaptation to mechanical loading in both cortical and cancellous bone is controlled locally and is confined to the loaded bones.

Authors:  Toshihiro Sugiyama; Joanna S Price; Lance E Lanyon
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  22 in total

1.  High and pointed type of femoral localized reaction frequently extends to complete and incomplete atypical femoral fracture in patients with autoimmune diseases on long-term glucocorticoids and bisphosphonates.

Authors:  H Sato; N Kondo; T Nakatsue; Y Wada; J Fujisawa; J J Kazama; T Kuroda; Y Suzuki; M Nakano; N Endo; I Narita
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bmp2 in osteoblasts of periosteum and trabecular bone links bone formation to vascularization and mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Wuchen Yang; Dayong Guo; Marie A Harris; Yong Cui; Jelica Gluhak-Heinrich; Junjie Wu; Xiao-Dong Chen; Charles Skinner; Jeffry S Nyman; James R Edwards; Gregory R Mundy; Alex Lichtler; Barbara E Kream; David W Rowe; Ivo Kalajzic; Val David; Darryl L Quarles; Demetri Villareal; Greg Scott; Manas Ray; S Liu; James F Martin; Yuji Mishina; Stephen E Harris
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Transcriptional profiling of intramembranous and endochondral ossification after fracture in mice.

Authors:  Brandon A Coates; Jennifer A McKenzie; Evan G Buettmann; Xiaochen Liu; Paul M Gontarz; Bo Zhang; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Surgical Treatment of the Atypical Femoral Fracture: Overcoming Femoral Bowing.

Authors:  Kyung-Jae Lee; Byung-Woo Min
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2018-12-06

Review 5.  The convergence of fracture repair and stem cells: interplay of genes, aging, environmental factors and disease.

Authors:  Michael Hadjiargyrou; Regis J O'Keefe
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  HIF-1α disturbs osteoblasts and osteoclasts coupling in bone remodeling by up-regulating OPG expression.

Authors:  Jin Shao; Yan Zhang; Tieyi Yang; Jin Qi; Lianfang Zhang; Lianfu Deng
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Fracture repair requires TrkA signaling by skeletal sensory nerves.

Authors:  Zhu Li; Carolyn A Meyers; Leslie Chang; Seungyong Lee; Zhi Li; Ryan Tomlinson; Ahmet Hoke; Thomas L Clemens; Aaron W James
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  HIF-1α regulates bone formation after osteogenic mechanical loading.

Authors:  Ryan E Tomlinson; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Lineage-Specific Wnt Reporter Elucidates Mesenchymal Wnt Signaling during Bone Repair.

Authors:  Leslie Chang; Lei Zhang; Jiajia Xu; Carolyn A Meyers; Zhu Li; Noah Yan; Erin Zou; Aaron W James
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Angiogenesis is required for stress fracture healing in rats.

Authors:  Ryan E Tomlinson; Jennifer A McKenzie; Anne H Schmieder; Gregory R Wohl; Gregory M Lanza; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.