| Literature DB >> 20214785 |
Mikhail Krasavin1, Konstantin A Rufanov, Andrey V Sosnov, Ruben Karapetian, Elena Godovykh, Olga Soldatkina, Yan Lavrovsky, Andrei A Gakh.
Abstract
A new chemical series of antiproliferative compounds was identified via high-throughput screening on DU-145 human prostate carcinoma cell line (hit compound potency - 5.7 microM). Exploration of the two peripheral diversity vectors of the hit molecule in a hit-targeted library and testing of the resulting compounds led to SAR generalizations and identification of the 'best' pharmacophoric moieties. The latter were merged in a single compound that exhibited a 200-fold better potency than the original hit compound. Specific cancer cell cytotoxicity was confirmed for the most potent compounds.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20214785 PMCID: PMC2848039 DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-4-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Structure of the hit compound identified in DU-145 cell proliferation HTS.
Scheme 1Preparation of N-aryl-N-(3-aryl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl)amines 2 [8]. Reagents and conditions: (a) hydroxylamine hydrochloride (1 eq.), EtOH, reflux, 5-10 h; (b) aq. Na2CO3, extraction with EtOAc; (c) 0.2 M solution of 3 in dry DMF, 2.1 eq. of R2-N = C = N-R2 carbodiimides, 120°C, 18-36 h.
Structures, preparative yields (from 3), and DU-145 proliferation inhibition data of compounds 2a-s.
| Compound | R1 | R2 | Yield, % | IC50, μM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | 2.2 ± 0.30 | |||
| 68 | 0.86 ± 0.10 | |||
| 70 | 1.6 ± 0.25 | |||
| 29 | 2.6 ± 0.35 | |||
| 43 | 1.0 ± 0.01 | |||
| 43 | 1.0 ± 0.12 | |||
| 73 | 2.7 ± 0.22 | |||
| 37 | 1.6 ± 0.14 | |||
| 77 | 0.64 ± 0.025 | |||
| 56 | 0.55 ± 0.010 | |||
| 81 | 0.084 ± 0.005 | |||
| 54 | 2.7 ± 0.50 | |||
| 46 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | |||
| 72 | 0.93 ± 0.009 | |||
| 75 | 1.8 ± 0.30 | |||
| 82 | 2.1 ± 0.17 | |||
| 65 | 0.91 ± 0.07 | |||
| 66 | 1.5 ± 0.09 | |||
| 55 | 0.38 ± 0.024 |
IC50 values have been evaluated for standard error. The values reported are the mean of 2 determinations, standard error provided.
Compound 2a reffered in this table is indetical with the hit compound 1 in the text and figure 1.
Figure 2Examples of inactive or poorly active (% inhibition < 20% at 10 μM) compounds 2.
Figure 3The 'best' SAR-merging compound 2t.
Figure 4Cytotoxicity of the most active compounds prepared in this work and digitonin measured on HepG2 (A) and DU-145 (B) cells.