Literature DB >> 20214408

Predictions of metabolic drug-drug interactions using physiologically based modelling: Two cytochrome P450 3A4 substrates coadministered with ketoconazole or verapamil.

Nathalie Perdaems1, Helene Blasco, Cedric Vinson, Marylore Chenel, Sarah Whalley, Fanny Cazade, François Bouzom.   

Abstract

Nowadays, evaluation of potential risk of metabolic drug-drug interactions (mDDIs) is of high importance within the pharmaceutical industry, in order to improve safety and reduce the attrition rate of new drugs. Accurate and early prediction of mDDIs has become essential for drug research and development, and in vitro experiments designed to evaluate potential mDDIs are systematically included in the drug development plan prior to clinical assessment. The aim of this study was to illustrate the value and limitations of the classical and new approaches available to predict risks of DDIs in the research and development processes. The interaction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole and verapamil) with midazolam was predicted using the inhibitor concentration/inhibition constant ([I]/K(i)) approach, the static approach with added variability (Simcyp(R)), and whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (WB-PBPK) modelling (acslXtreme(R)). Then an in-house reference drug was used to challenge the different approaches based on the midazolam experience. Predicted values (pharmacokinetic parameters, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC] ratio and plasma concentrations) were compared with observed values obtained after intravenous and oral administration in order to assess the accuracy of the prediction methods. With the [I]/K(i) approach, the interaction risk was always overpredicted for the midazolam substrate, regardless of its route of administration and the coadministered inhibitor. However, the predictions were always satisfactory (within 2-fold) for the reference drug. For the Simcyp(R) calculations, two of the three interaction results for midazolam were overpredicted, both when midazolam was given orally, whereas the prediction obtained when midazolam was administered intravenously was satisfactory. For the reference drug, all predictions could be considered satisfactory. For the WB-PBPK approach, all predictions were satisfactory, regardless of the substrate, route of administration, dose and coadministered inhibitor. DDI risk predictions are performed throughout the research and development processes and are now fully integrated into decision-making processes. The regulatory approach is useful to provide alerts, even at a very early stage of drug development. The 'steady state' approach in Simcyp(R) improves the prediction by using physiological knowledge and mechanistic assumptions. The DDI predictions are very useful, as they provide a range of AUC ratios that include individuals at the extremes of the population, in addition to the 'average tendency'. Finally, the WB-PBPK approach improves the predictions by simulating the concentration-time profiles and calculating the related pharmacokinetic parameters, taking into account the time of administration of each drug - but it requires a good understanding of the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion properties of the compound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20214408     DOI: 10.2165/11318130-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  56 in total

1.  Prediction of adipose tissue: plasma partition coefficients for structurally unrelated drugs.

Authors:  P Poulin; K Schoenlein; F P Theil
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  Prediction of in vivo drug clearance from in vitro data. I: impact of inter-individual variability.

Authors:  E M Howgate; K Rowland Yeo; N J Proctor; G T Tucker; A Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.908

3.  Quantitative prediction of metabolic inhibition of midazolam by erythromycin, diltiazem, and verapamil in rats: implication of concentrative uptake of inhibitors into liver.

Authors:  K Yamano; K Yamamoto; H Kotaki; S Takedomi; H Matsuo; Y Sawada; T Iga
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Enantioselective distribution of verapamil and norverapamil into human and rat erythrocytes: the role of plasma protein binding.

Authors:  M A Robinson; R Mehvar
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.627

5.  Prediction of in vivo drug-drug interactions from in vitro data : factors affecting prototypic drug-drug interactions involving CYP2C9, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4.

Authors:  Hayley S Brown; Aleksandra Galetin; David Hallifax; J Brian Houston
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Gene and protein expression of P-glycoprotein, MRP1, MRP2, and CYP3A4 in the small and large human intestine.

Authors:  Sofia Berggren; Christine Gall; Nadine Wollnitz; Mats Ekelund; Urban Karlbom; Janet Hoogstraate; Dieter Schrenk; Hans Lennernäs
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Comparison of midazolam and simvastatin as cytochrome P450 3A probes.

Authors:  Ellen Chung; Anne N Nafziger; David J Kazierad; Joseph S Bertino
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Midazolam exhibits characteristics of a highly permeable P-glycoprotein substrate.

Authors:  Sanna Tolle-Sander; Jarkko Rautio; Steve Wring; Joseph W Polli; James E Polli
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Quantitative evaluation of pharmacokinetic inhibition of CYP3A substrates by ketoconazole: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ping Zhao; Isabelle Ragueneau-Majlessi; Lei Zhang; John M Strong; Kellie S Reynolds; Rene H Levy; Kenneth E Thummel; Shiew-Mei Huang
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.126

10.  P-glycoprotein increases from proximal to distal regions of human small intestine.

Authors:  Stéphane Mouly; Mary F Paine
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  12 in total

1.  Assessment of algorithms for predicting drug-drug interactions via inhibition mechanisms: comparison of dynamic and static models.

Authors:  Eleanor J Guest; Karen Rowland-Yeo; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Geoffrey T Tucker; J Brian Houston; Aleksandra Galetin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Model-based approaches for ivabradine development in paediatric population, part I: study preparation assessment.

Authors:  Sophie Peigné; François Bouzom; Karl Brendel; Charlotte Gesson; Sylvain Fouliard; Marylore Chenel
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  A semiphysiological population pharmacokinetic model for dynamic inhibition of liver and gut wall cytochrome P450 3A by voriconazole.

Authors:  Sebastian Frechen; Lisa Junge; Teijo I Saari; Ahmed Abbas Suleiman; Dennis Rokitta; Pertti J Neuvonen; Klaus T Olkkola; Uwe Fuhr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Optimal sampling times for a drug and its metabolite using SIMCYP(®) simulations as prior information.

Authors:  Cyrielle Dumont; France Mentré; Clare Gaynor; Karl Brendel; Charlotte Gesson; Marylore Chenel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Prediction of drug disposition in diabetic patients by means of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Jia Li; Hai-Fang Guo; Can Liu; Zeyu Zhong; Li Liu; Xiao-Dong Liu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Examination of the Impact of CYP3A4/5 on Drug-Drug Interaction between Schizandrol A/Schizandrol B and Tacrolimus (FK-506): A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Qingfeng He; Fengjiao Bu; Qizhen Wang; Min Li; Jiaying Lin; Zhijia Tang; Wen Yao Mak; Xiaomei Zhuang; Xiao Zhu; Hai-Shu Lin; Xiaoqiang Xiang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Prediction of Cyclosporin-Mediated Drug Interaction Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Characterizing Interplay of Drug Transporters and Enzymes.

Authors:  Yiting Yang; Ping Li; Zexin Zhang; Zhongjian Wang; Li Liu; Xiaodong Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of impaired carboxylesterase-1 activity: effects on oseltamivir disposition.

Authors:  Zhe-Yi Hu; Andrea N Edginton; S Casey Laizure; Robert B Parker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Randomised controlled trial of two sequential artemisinin-based combination therapy regimens to treat uncomplicated falciparum malaria in African children: a protocol to investigate safety, efficacy and adherence.

Authors:  Henk Dfh Schallig; Halidou Tinto; Patrick Sawa; Harparkash Kaur; Stephan Duparc; Deus S Ishengoma; Pascal Magnussen; Michael Alifrangis; Colin J Sutherland
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2017-08-30

Review 10.  Possible drug-drug interaction in dogs and cats resulted from alteration in drug metabolism: A mini review.

Authors:  Kazuaki Sasaki; Minoru Shimoda
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 10.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.