Literature DB >> 20213156

A staff questionnaire study of MRSA infection on ENT and general surgical wards.

P S Phillips1, A K Golagani, A Malik, F B Payne.   

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus (MRSA) infection has received much attention in both the medical and non-medical press. However, it is not widely encountered on ENT wards, given the profile of short-stay, relatively well patients, although its impact seems to be increasing. We wished to explore the knowledge and attitudes towards MRSA on general surgical and ENT wards, and see if there were any significant differences between specialties, or between doctors and nurses. A 13-item questionnaire with a Likert scale response with six knowledge questions and seven attitude questions was prepared. It was completed anonymously by all nursing and medical staffs on the ENT and general surgical wards of a large District General Hospital. ENT doctors displayed the lowest knowledge and attitude scores; however, this only attained significance in terms of the knowledge of the difference between infection and colonization. Overall, nurses displayed significantly more positive attitudes towards MRSA patients than doctors, but knowledge scores were not significantly different between professions. The study suggests a lack of knowledge about and preponderance of negative attitudes towards MRSA amongst ENT doctors. The difference between colonization and infection is not well understood. Reasons for this may include the relative rarity of MRSA cases on ENT wards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20213156     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1221-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  19 in total

1.  Compliance with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus precautions in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Waqqas Afif; Panhavat Huor; Paul Brassard; Vivian G Loo
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Shocked by attitude to MRSA.

Authors:  Winifred Beaumont
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-14

3.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: awareness and perceptions.

Authors:  J Gill; R Kumar; J Todd; C Wiskin
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  The impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on ENT practice.

Authors:  I J Nixon; B J G Bingham
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Medical staff knowledge about MRSA colonization and infection in acute hospitals.

Authors:  R A Seaton; A H Montazeri
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  New UK MRSA guidance: what happens next? Comparison of the UK MRSA guidelines with recent guidance from Scotland.

Authors:  D Baird
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  MRSA patients: proven methods to treat colonization and infection.

Authors:  J M Boyce
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Four cases of aggressive MRSA wound infection following head and neck surgery.

Authors:  M Parton; N J Beasley; G Harvey; D Houghton; A S Jones
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.469

9.  Risk factors for nosocomial bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Pujol; C Peña; R Pallares; J Ayats; J Ariza; F Gudiol
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  The significance of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and the incidence of postoperative wound infection.

Authors:  R P Wenzel; T M Perl
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.