PURPOSE: Cleansing the skin of intensive care unit (ICU) patients daily with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has been associated with beneficial effects, including a reduction in central-line-associated bacteremias (CLABSIs). Most studies have been done in medical ICUs. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of daily chlorhexidine skin cleansing on CLABSI rates in a surgical ICU. METHODS: In Fall 2005, the 30-bed surgical ICU at Rush University Medical Center discontinued daily soap-and-water bathing of patients and substituted skin cleansing with no-rinse, 2% CHG-impregnated cloths. This change was made without research investigator input or oversight. Using administrative, microbiological and infection control practitioner databases, we compared rates of CLABSIs and blood culture contamination during soap-and-water bathing (September 2004-October 2005) and CHG cleansing (November 2005-October 2006) periods. Rates of other nosocomial infections that were not expected to be affected by CHG bathing (secondary bacteremia, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, ventilator-associated pneumonia, urinary tract infection) were included as control variables. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the CLABSI rate between soap-and-water and CHG bathing periods (3.81/1,000 central line days vs. 4.6/1,000 central line days; p = 0.57). Blood culture contamination declined during CHG bathing (5.97/1,000 to 2.41/1,000 patient days; p = 0.003). Rates of other nosocomial infections did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world effectiveness trial, daily cleansing of surgical ICU patients' skin with CHG had no effect on CLABSI rates, but was associated with half the rate of blood culture contamination. Controlled trials in surgical ICUs are needed to determine whether CHG bathing can prevent infections in this setting.
PURPOSE: Cleansing the skin of intensive care unit (ICU) patients daily with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has been associated with beneficial effects, including a reduction in central-line-associated bacteremias (CLABSIs). Most studies have been done in medical ICUs. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of daily chlorhexidine skin cleansing on CLABSI rates in a surgical ICU. METHODS: In Fall 2005, the 30-bed surgical ICU at Rush University Medical Center discontinued daily soap-and-water bathing of patients and substituted skin cleansing with no-rinse, 2% CHG-impregnated cloths. This change was made without research investigator input or oversight. Using administrative, microbiological and infection control practitioner databases, we compared rates of CLABSIs and blood culture contamination during soap-and-water bathing (September 2004-October 2005) and CHG cleansing (November 2005-October 2006) periods. Rates of other nosocomial infections that were not expected to be affected by CHG bathing (secondary bacteremia, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, ventilator-associated pneumonia, urinary tract infection) were included as control variables. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the CLABSI rate between soap-and-water and CHG bathing periods (3.81/1,000 central line days vs. 4.6/1,000 central line days; p = 0.57). Blood culture contamination declined during CHG bathing (5.97/1,000 to 2.41/1,000 patient days; p = 0.003). Rates of other nosocomial infections did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world effectiveness trial, daily cleansing of surgical ICU patients' skin with CHG had no effect on CLABSI rates, but was associated with half the rate of blood culture contamination. Controlled trials in surgical ICUs are needed to determine whether CHG bathing can prevent infections in this setting.
Authors: Naomi P O'grady; Mary Alexander; E Patchen Dellinger; Julie L Gerberding; Stephen O Heard; Dennis G Maki; Henry Masur; Rita D McCormick; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne Randolph; Robert A Weinstein Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Susan C Bleasdale; William E Trick; Ines M Gonzalez; Rosie D Lyles; Mary K Hayden; Robert A Weinstein Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-10-22
Authors: Kyle J Popovich; Bala Hota; Robert Hayes; Robert A Weinstein; Mary K Hayden Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Michael W Climo; Kent A Sepkowitz; Gianna Zuccotti; Victoria J Fraser; David K Warren; Trish M Perl; Kathleen Speck; John A Jernigan; Jaime R Robles; Edward S Wong Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: A Borer; J Gilad; N Porat; R Megrelesvilli; L Saidel-Odes; N Peled; S Eskira; F Schlaeffer; Y Almog Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Leila Vali; Sarah E Davies; Lindsay L G Lai; Jayshree Dave; Sebastian G B Amyes Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2008-01-28 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Kristen V Dicks; Eric Lofgren; Sarah S Lewis; Rebekah W Moehring; Daniel J Sexton; Deverick J Anderson Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; Herwig Gerlach; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 17.440