Literature DB >> 20211935

Comparison of the automated oscillometric method with the gold standard Doppler ultrasound method to access the ankle-brachial pressure index.

Jean-François Hamel1, David Foucaud, Serge Fanello.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite its screening interest, the ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) remains uncommon in general practice, because it needs training and specific devices as Doppler. Easier methods such as the use of automated oscillometric devices may facilitate the peripheral arterial diseases (PADs) screening. We wanted to assess the reliability of the automated oscillometric measurement of the ABPI, compared with the gold standard Doppler ultrasound measurement. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: In 287 patients aged 65 years or older without diagnosed PAD, we performed ABPI measurements with oscillometric and Doppler devices. Reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient of agreement (R) and the Bland and Altman method.
RESULTS: The intermethod reliability was bad (R = .346, 95% CI = (0.268-0.420)), with a large confidence interval of the individual differences between the 2 methods: 95% CI = (-0.183-0.346).
CONCLUSION: Automatic oscillometric devices cannot be recommended as reliable methods for ABPI measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20211935     DOI: 10.1177/0003319709360522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angiology        ISSN: 0003-3197            Impact factor:   3.619


  6 in total

1.  Atypical leg symptoms: does routine measurement of the ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) in primary care benefit patients?

Authors:  Christine Oesterling; Amun Kalia; Thomas Chetcuti; Steven Walker
Journal:  London J Prim Care (Abingdon)       Date:  2015-09-28

2.  Diagnostic Accuracy Study of an Oscillometric Ankle-Brachial Index in Peripheral Arterial Disease: The Influence of Oscillometric Errors and Calcified Legs.

Authors:  Ángel Herráiz-Adillo; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno; Iván Cavero-Redondo; Celia Álvarez-Bueno; Miriam Garrido-Miguel; Blanca Notario-Pacheco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Min Liu; Dawei Chen; Chun Wang; Guanjian Liu; Xingwu Ran
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.257

4.  Comparison between oscillometric- and Doppler-ABI in elderly individuals.

Authors:  Ikuno Takahashi; Kyoji Furukawa; Waka Ohishi; Tetsuya Takahashi; Masayasu Matsumoto; Saeko Fujiwara
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-03-08

5.  Validity and reliability of the ankle-brachial index by oscillometric blood pressure and automated ankle-brachial index.

Authors:  Sukanya Chongthawonsatid; Somchai Dutsadeevettakul
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  The reliability of the ankle brachial index: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Casey; Sean Lanting; Christopher Oldmeadow; Vivienne Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.303

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.