Literature DB >> 20211514

Change in the ovarian environment after hysterectomy as assessed by ovarian arterial blood flow indices and serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels.

Dong-Yun Lee1, Hyun-Jung Park, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk-Soo Bae, Byung-Koo Yoon, Dooseok Choi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the changes in the ovarian environment after hysterectomy based on ovarian arterial blood flow indices and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels. STUDY
DESIGN: Ovarian arterial blood flow indices (pulsatile and resistance indices) by Doppler ultrasonography and serum AMH levels were measured at baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after hysterectomy in 32 women ranging in age from 38 to 49 years, or at the time of screening in 21 age-matched controls. The study subjects underwent hysterectomy with conservation of both ovaries for benign diseases of the uterus (laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy [LAVH], n=26; and total abdominal hysterectomy [TAH], n=6). The study subjects and controls were analyzed using a t-test or one-way analysis of variance.
RESULTS: No differences existed in demographic profiles, ovarian arterial blood flow indices, and serum AMH levels at baseline between the hysterectomy and control groups. Ovarian arterial blood flow indices did not change before and after surgery, and there were no serial changes in the mean levels of serum AMH at each time point (1.80+/-1.81 ng/mL [pre-operatively], 1.69+/-1.62 ng/mL [1 week post-hysterectomy], 1.42+/-1.34 ng/mL [1 month post-hysterectomy], and 1.52+/-1.72 ng/mL [3 months post-hysterectomy]; p=0.805). In addition, no significant differences in ovarian arterial blood flow indices and serum AMH levels existed between the LAVH and TAH groups.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that hysterectomy does not affect the ovarian environment for up to 3 months post-operatively, as assessed by ovarian arterial blood flow indices and serum AMH levels. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20211514     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

1.  Comparative study on induction and effects of surgical menopause in a female rat model: a prospective case control study.

Authors:  Fady Ms Moiety; Hesham A Salem; Radwa A Mehanna; Bedor S Abdel-Ghany
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

2.  Hysterectomy and perceived physical function in middle-aged Australian women: a 20-year population-based prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Louise F Wilson; Nirmala Pandeya; Julie Byles; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Assessment of ovarian reserve using anti-Müllerian hormone levels in benign gynecologic conditions and surgical interventions: a systematic narrative review.

Authors:  Akira Iwase; Tomoko Nakamura; Tatsuo Nakahara; Maki Goto; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Cohort profile: the Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging-2 (MOA-2) in Olmsted County, Minnesota (USA).

Authors:  Walter A Rocca; Liliana Gazzuola Rocca; Carin Y Smith; Brandon R Grossardt; Stephanie S Faubion; Lynne T Shuster; Elizabeth A Stewart; Michelle M Mielke; Kejal Kantarci; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage?

Authors:  Fatma Ferda Verit; Orkun Çetin; Seda Keskin; Hürkan Akyol; Ali Galip Zebitay
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2019-03-01

6.  Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Circulating Anti-Müllerian Hormone Concentration in Healthy Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Tess V Clendenen; Wenzhen Ge; Karen L Koenig; Yelena Afanasyeva; Claudia Agnoli; Elizabeth Bertone-Johnson; Louise A Brinton; Farbod Darvishian; Joanne F Dorgan; A Heather Eliassen; Roni T Falk; Göran Hallmans; Susan E Hankinson; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Timothy J Key; Vittorio Krogh; Hazel B Nichols; Dale P Sandler; Minouk J Schoemaker; Patrick M Sluss; Malin Sund; Anthony J Swerdlow; Kala Visvanathan; Mengling Liu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.134

Review 7.  The many menopauses: searching the cognitive research literature for menopause types.

Authors:  Hannaford Edwards; Annie Duchesne; April S Au; Gillian Einstein
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  What is the impact of PPAR-γ agonist-rosiglitazone on ovarian reserve after hysterectomy? An experimental study

Authors:  Burcu Gündoğdu; Ömer Lütfi Tapisiz; Berna Dilbaz; Serkan Bariş Mülazimoğlu; Kamil Hakan Müftüoğlu; Betül Dündar; Ümit Göktolga
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 0.973

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.