Literature DB >> 20211318

Comparison of usefulness of exercise testing versus coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of patients suspected of having coronary artery disease.

Kristian A Ovrehus1, Jesper K Jensen, Hans F Mickley, Henrik Munkholm, Morten Bøttcher, Hans E Bøtker, Bjarne L Nørgaard.   

Abstract

In patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD), we compared the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of exercise testing using ST-segment changes alone and ST-segment changes, angina pectoris, and hemodynamic variables compared to coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Quantitative invasive coronary angiography was the reference method (>50% coronary lumen reduction). A positive exercise test was defined as the development of significant ST-segment changes (> or =1 mV measured 80 ms from the J-point), and the occurrence of one or more of the following criteria: ST-segment changes > or =1 mV measured 80 ms from the J-point, angina pectoris, ventricular arrhythmia (the occurrence of > or =3 premature ventricular beats), and > or =20 mm Hg decrease in systolic blood pressure during the test. Positive results on CTA were defined as a coronary lumen reduction of > or =50%. In 100 patients (61 +/- 9 years old, 50% men, and 29% prevalence of significant CAD), the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of exercise testing using ST-segment changes was 45% (95% confidence interval 53% to 87%) and 63% (95% confidence interval 61% to 84%), respectively. However, the inclusion of all test variables yielded a sensitivity of 72% (95% confidence interval 53% to 87%) and a specificity of 37% (95% confidence interval 26% to 49%). The diagnostic sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval 82% to 100%) and specificity of 80% (95% confidence interval 69% to 89%) for CTA, however, were superior to any of the exercise test analysis strategies. In conclusion, in patients suspected of having CAD, the diagnostic sensitivity of exercise testing significantly improves if all test variables are included compared to using ST-segment changes exclusively. Furthermore, the superior diagnostic performance of CTA for the detection and exclusion of significant CAD might favor CTA as the first-line diagnostic test in patients suspected of having CAD. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20211318     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

1.  Frontline diagnostic evaluation of patients suspected of angina by coronary computed tomography reduces downstream resource utilization when compared to conventional ischemia testing.

Authors:  Lene H Nielsen; John Markenvard; Jesper M Jensen; Hans Mickley; Kristian A Øvrehus; Bjarne L Nørgaard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies on non-invasive coronary CT angiography: influence of QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies included in systematic reviews) items on sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  Sabine Schueler; Stefan Walther; Georg M Schuetz; Peter Schlattmann; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography versus exercise electrocardiography for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinxin Yin; Jiali Wang; Wen Zheng; Jingjing Ma; Panpan Hao; Yuguo Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Reproducibility of coronary plaque detection and characterization using low radiation dose coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients with intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease (ReSCAN study).

Authors:  Kristian Altern Øvrehus; Mohamed Marwan; Hans Erik Bøtker; Stephan Achenbach; Bjarne Linde Nørgaard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05-29       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Immediate computed tomography coronary angiography versus delayed outpatient stress testing for detecting coronary artery disease in emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  David E Winchester; Preeti Jois; Steven M Kraft; David C Wymer; James A Hill
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Cardiac CT vs. Stress Testing in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Review and Expert Recommendations.

Authors:  Amir Ali Rahsepar; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2015-06-17

7.  Exercise electrocardiogram testing in two brothers with different outcome - a case study exercise testing in master cyclists.

Authors:  Christoph Alexander Rüst; Beat Knechtle; Thomas Rosemann
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2013-06-17

8.  Computed tomography angiography versus Agatston score for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with stable chest pain: individual patient data meta-analysis of the international COME-CCT Consortium.

Authors:  Viktoria Wieske; Mario Walther; Benjamin Dubourg; Hatem Alkadhi; Bjarne L Nørgaard; Matthijs F L Meijs; Axel C P Diederichsen; Yung-Liang Wan; Hans Mickley; Konstantin Nikolaou; Abbas A Shabestari; Bjørn A Halvorsen; Eugenio Martuscelli; Kai Sun; Bernhard A Herzog; Roy P Marcus; Sebastian Leschka; Mario J Garcia; Kristian A Ovrehus; Juhani Knuuti; Vladymir Mendoza-Rodriguez; Nuno Bettencourt; Simone Muraglia; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann; Elke Zimmermann; Jean-Claude Tardif; Matthew J Budoff; Peter Schlattmann; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 9.  Use of 3x2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies.

Authors:  Georg M Schuetz; Peter Schlattmann; Marc Dewey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-10-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.