Literature DB >> 20211301

Cuff and aortic pressure differences during dobutamine infusion: a study of the effects of systolic blood pressure amplification.

Harold Smulyan1, Ratnakar Mukherjee, Paul R Sheehe, Michel E Safar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central aortic systolic blood pressures (SBPs) differ from and are preferable to cuff pressures when calculating cardiac work, left ventricular wall stress, and rate-pressure product. Despite the widespread use of dobutamine, differences between aortic and brachial SBP (pulse amplification) and pulse transmission during dobutamine infusion have not been previously studied. This study assessed these differences and used applanated radial pulses with the Sphygmocor (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) device to investigate the effects of dobutamine on arterial pulse transmission and pulse amplification.
METHODS: Using a cuff oscillometer, brachial arterial pressures were measured simultaneously with directly recorded aortic pressures at rest and during increasing dobutamine infusion rates in 25 patients. In 15 of those patients, applanated radial pulses were fed into the Sphygmocor device and calibrated in 2 ways to predict aortic pressures.
RESULTS: At peak dobutamine infusion, SBP amplification averaged 14.9 mm Hg, with a maximum difference of 43 mm Hg. When radial artery pulses were calibrated using cuff pressures, the Sphygmocor underestimated the aortic SBP at all dobutamine doses. However, when radial artery pulses were calibrated using the more accurate aortic mean and diastolic BPs, the Sphygmocor accurately predicted the aortic SBP at baseline, but not at the higher dobutamine doses.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar to exercise, dobutamine induced cuff SBPs and pulse pressures higher than those measured in the aorta-uncorrected by the cuff-calibrated Sphygmocor. This increasing pulse amplification was explained by the effects of dobutamine on the properties of the conduit arterial walls, on changes in pulse wave velocity, on increasing heart rate, and on reflected waves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20211301     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  3 in total

1.  Different effects of tocolytic medication on blood pressure and blood pressure amplification.

Authors:  Isabelle Fabry; Peter De Paepe; Jan Kips; Sebastian Vermeersch; Luc Van Bortel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Older age is associated with greater central aortic blood pressure following the exercise stress test in subjects with similar brachial systolic blood pressure.

Authors:  Masatake Kobayashi; Kazutaka Oshima; Yoichi Iwasaki; Yuto Kumai; Alberto Avolio; Akira Yamashina; Kenji Takazawa
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Hemodynamic correlates of late systolic flow velocity augmentation in the carotid artery.

Authors:  Kevin S Heffernan; Wesley K Lefferts; Jacqueline A Augustine
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 2.420

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.