Literature DB >> 20211

Studies on the antigenicity of an inactivated, aluminum hydroxide adjuvant equine influenza vaccine.

C J Kucera, W H Beckenhauer.   

Abstract

An inactivated, aluminum hydroxide adjuvant equine influenza vaccine was tested in horses and guinea pigs to determine the levels of antigen that would elicit maximum serological responses. Vaccine containing serial twofold increments of A/Equi-1/Prague and A/Equi-2/Miami strains of equine influenza virus was administered to random groupings of both types of test animals. The hemagglutination inhibition antibody response for each group was then measured. Results in horses and guinea pigs were compared to determine if the equine serological values could be related to a potency test in laboratory animals. The highest mean hemagglutination inhibition antibody response in horses occurred in groups vaccinated, respectively, with 128 or 256 hemagglutination units of A/Equi-1 and 512 or 1024 hemagglutination units of A/Equi-2 antigen. Groups vaccinated with further two- or fourfold increases in these antigens had mean hemagglutination inhibition titers that were somewhat lower than the maximum levels. When graded doses of vaccine were given to guinea pigs, their hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers reached a plateau of maximum values, similar to the serological response in vaccinated horses. Test horses remained clinically free from signs of equine influenza during the year following vaccination and no untoward post-vaccination reactions were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 20211      PMCID: PMC1277597     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Comp Med        ISSN: 0008-4050


  9 in total

1.  Immunization of young horses against viral rhinopneumonitis.

Authors:  E R DOLL; J T BRYANS
Journal:  Cornell Vet       Date:  1963-01

2.  The evaluation of an experimental bivalent equine influenza virus vaccine.

Authors:  J L DeMeio; D E Gutekunst; J M Beiler; I M Paton; A N DeSanctis
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1969-07-15       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  Serological response of chickens, rabbits and guinea-pigs to equine influenza vaccines.

Authors:  G N Frerichs; C C Frerichs
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.534

4.  Comments on aqueous and adjuvanted equine influenza vaccines.

Authors:  R C Reisinger
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1969-07-15       Impact factor: 1.936

5.  The case for an adjuvanted equine influenza vaccine.

Authors:  C J Kucera
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1969-07-15       Impact factor: 1.936

6.  An assessment of oil adjuvant and aqueous influenza vaccines. II. Antibody responses to the vaccines.

Authors:  J R Forsyth; E E Russell
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1967-12

7.  An assessment of oil adjuvant and aqueous influenza vaccines. I. Reactions to the vaccines.

Authors:  J R Forsyth
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1967-12

8.  Immunization for equine influenza.

Authors:  J T Bryans; E R Doll; J C Wilson; W H McCollum
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1966-02-15       Impact factor: 1.936

9.  Use of sodium alginate adjuvant in immunization against equine influenza.

Authors:  I L Shechmeister; T Aeschliman; W G Kammlade
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 1.156

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Equine Influenza Virus and Vaccines.

Authors:  Fatai S Oladunni; Saheed Oluwasina Oseni; Luis Martinez-Sobrido; Thomas M Chambers
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 5.818

2.  Comparison of two modern vaccines and previous influenza infection against challenge with an equine influenza virus from the Australian 2007 outbreak.

Authors:  Neil A Bryant; Romain Paillot; Adam S Rash; Elizabeth Medcalf; Fernando Montesso; Julie Ross; James Watson; Martyn Jeggo; Nicola S Lewis; J Richard Newton; Debra M Elton
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.683

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.