Literature DB >> 20210656

A novel approach for a complete laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision.

Ahmed Ghazi1, Alexander Shefler, Martin Gruell, Reinhold Zimmermann, Gunter Janetschek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The dilemma in management of the distal ureter and bladder cuff during nephroureterectomy (NU) for transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the upper urinary tract has delayed the development of a completely minimally invasive approach to NU in cases of TCC. Our aim is to present our technique of a purely laparoscopic nephroureterectomy performed entirely through laparoscopic ports, which mimics established principles of open surgical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision. Precluding the needed for patient repositioning, complex endoscopic procedures either before or after nephrectomy and leaving the bladder cuff defect to heal spontaneously. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient positioning and trocar arrangement are similar to those of radical nephrectomy. The simple addition of a 5 mm trocar in the lower abdomen (midline or lateral to the rectus muscle, according to patient build) allows the surgeon to adequately dissect the distal ureter, excise an adequate bladder cuff, and suture the bladder defect in a watertight manner without the need for transurethral and intraureteral instrumentation as well as intraoperative repositioning of the patient.
RESULTS: Eight cases were successfully treated. The operative time ranged from 110 to 200 minutes (mean 157 min). The median time for catheter removal was 7 days; in one patient, catheter removal was delayed to 15 days because of bladder extravasation. Average hospital stay was 10.2 days. During a mean follow-up of 12.1 months, three patients had Ta bladder recurrence, and one patient had local recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: A complete NU with bladder cuff excision can be accomplished using this approach, with early results comparable to the gold standard of open surgery with the simple addition of a trocar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20210656     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  [Comparison of efficacy and safety between two different methods of nephroureterectomy in two centers].

Authors:  J F Wu; R C Lin; Y C Lin; W H Cai; Q G Zhu; D Fang; G Y Xiong; L Zhang; L Q Zhou; L F Ye; X S Li
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-08-18

2.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

3.  Initial satisfying experience of total retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: a retrospective comparative research.

Authors:  Xianjin Wang; Jun Yao; Xingwei Jin; Xiang Zhang; Guoliang Lu; Yuan Shao; Junwei Pan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-05

4.  Role of the Laparoscopic Approach for Complex Urologic Surgery in the Era of Robotics.

Authors:  Iulia Andras; Angelo Territo; Teodora Telecan; Paul Medan; Ion Perciuleac; Alexandru Berindean; Dan V Stanca; Maximilian Buzoianu; Ioan Coman; Nicolae Crisan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Complete laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with intravesical lockable clip.

Authors:  Milan Hora; Viktor Eret; Tomáš Urge; Jiří Klečka; Ivan Trávníček; Ondřej Hes; Fredrik Petersson; Petr Stránský
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2012-06-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.