Literature DB >> 20210

Electrolyte levels and net fluid and electrolyte movements in the gastrointestinal tract of weanling swine.

D L Hamilton, W E Roe.   

Abstract

Electrolyte concentrations, osmolality and pH were determined in conventionally raised weanling swine fed a liquid diet. Incorporation of a dilution marker into the diet in combination with frequent feeding enabled estimations as to the sites of relative fluid and electrolyte absorption and secretion along the gastrointestinal tract. Unlike many other species the weanling pig depends largely on its large intestine for absorption of fluid and electrolytes with small changes in net fluid movement occurring along the jejunal and ileal segments. Additional observations included the absorption of water by the porcine stomach which increased dilution marker concentration by approximately twofold and the high osmolality values recorded in the small and large intestine. The implications of these observations are discussed with regard to pathogenesis of colibacillary diarrhea in the weanling pig.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 20210      PMCID: PMC1277586     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Comp Med        ISSN: 0008-4050


  21 in total

1.  THE CONCENTRATION OF ELECTROLYTES IN THE ALIMENTARY TRACT OF THE RABBIT, GUINEA PIG, DOG AND CAT.

Authors:  F ALEXANDER
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 2.534

2.  The influence of acid on the gastric absorption of water, sodium and potassium.

Authors:  C F CODE; J A HIGGINS; J C MOLL; A L ORVIS; J F SCHOLER
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Rate of absorption of water from stomach and small bowel of human beings.

Authors:  J F SCHOLER; C F CODE
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1954-11       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  GASTRIC SECRETION. III. THE ABSORPTION OF HEAVY WATER FROM POUCHES OF THE BODY AND ANTRUM OF THE STOMACH OF THE DOG.

Authors:  O Cope; H Blatt; M R Ball
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1943-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  A review of some effects on health and performance of variations in the physical form of the diet of the growing pig. II. Fibrous constituents and water level.

Authors:  T L Lawrence
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1972-07-22       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  The vascular architecture of the porcine small intestine.

Authors:  J E Bellamy; W K Latshaw; N O Nielsen
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1973-01

Review 7.  Digestion: intestinal secretion.

Authors:  T R Hendrix; T M Bayless
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 19.318

8.  Enteric colibacillosis in swine.

Authors:  N O Nielsen; H W Moon; W E Roe
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1968-12-15       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 9.  Methods for studies of intestinal absorption in man.

Authors:  H L Duthie
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 4.291

10.  Sites of organic acid production and pattern of digesta movement in the gastrointestinal tract of swine.

Authors:  E T Clemens; C E Stevens; M Southworth
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.798

View more
  4 in total

1.  Differential expression of intestinal ion transporters and water channel aquaporins in young piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88.

Authors:  C Zhu; J L Ye; J Yang; K M Yang; Z Chen; R Liang; X J Wu; L Wang; Z Y Jiang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Colonic compensation in transmissible gastroenteritis of swine.

Authors:  R A Argenzio; H W Moon; L J Kemeny; S C Whipp
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Attaching and effacing activities of rabbit and human enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in pig and rabbit intestines.

Authors:  H W Moon; S C Whipp; R A Argenzio; M M Levine; R A Giannella
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Tissue and cellular expression patterns of porcine CFTR: similarities to and differences from human CFTR.

Authors:  Stephanie Plog; Lars Mundhenk; Melanie K Bothe; Nikolai Klymiuk; Achim D Gruber
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 2.479

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.