| Literature DB >> 20208976 |
Gregor McCombie, Lucy M Browning, Christopher M Titman, Molly Song, John Shockcor, Susan A Jebb, Julian L Griffin.
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that a combination of weight loss and fish oil supplementation reduce cardiovascular disease and diabetes risks by increasing adiponectin and reducing triacylglyceride concentrations, while weight loss alone significantly improves insulin sensitivity and reduces inflammation. Here, a metabolomic approach, using a combination of (1)H-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy, and gas and liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, was employed to elucidate the metabolic changes in blood plasma following weight loss and fish oil supplementation. The intervention study was conducted over 24 weeks, with 93 female subjects randomised to one of three groups. Two groups followed a 12-week weight loss program, followed by a 12-week weight maintenance period and were randomised to fish or placebo oil capsules; a control group did not follow the weight loss program and were given placebo oil capsules. Lipid profiles changed dramatically upon fish oil intake and subtly across the two weight loss groups. While the fish oil supplementation increased the proportion of various phospholipid species, previously reported reductions in total triacylglycerides (TAGs) upon fish oil intake were shown to be driven by a reduction in a specific subset of the measured TAGs. This remodelling of triglycerides may represent further beneficial effects of fish oil supplementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11306-009-0161-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20208976 PMCID: PMC2826632 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-009-0161-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolomics ISSN: 1573-3882 Impact factor: 4.290
Fig. 1Summary of the study design. Numbers in the boxes indicate the number of subjects. Black boxes indicate groups taking fish oil supplements and display the biggest differences to the other groups. The grey box shows some differences to all others due to weight loss
Summary of selected clinical data (SD) for the subject groups studied. For more information see (Krebs et al. 2006)
| BFO | IFO | FFO | BPO | IPO | FPO | BC | IC | FC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (Kg) | 92.5 | 82.6 | 82.3 | 90.8 | 79.9 | 79.5 | 90.9 | 90.6 | 91.2 |
| Waist circumfence (cm) | 98.7 | 91.3 | 91.1 | 99.2 | 90.7 | 90.9 | 98.3 | 98.7 | 99.3 |
| BMI (Kg m−2) | 35.3 | 31.5 | 31.4 | 34.6 | 30.5 | 30.3 | 33.6 | 33.5 | 33.6 |
| AUC insulin (pmol/120 min) | 47333 | 32909 | 51534 | 36390 | 46396 | 53460 | |||
| AUC glucose (mmol/120 min) | 932 | 835 | 935 | 847 | 872 | 923 | |||
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 1.42 | 0.96 | 1.73 | 1.36 | 1.48 | 1.42 | |||
| Leptin | 26.7 | 16.8 | 25.9 | 13.6 | 29.1 | 26.0 | |||
| Adiponectin (μg/ml) | 10.52 | 12.85 | 11.43 | 11.21 | 9.18 | 9.71 |
Fig. 2Two NMR spectra of a subjects’ plasma at baseline (without fish supplementation; BFO) and after 12 weeks (with fish oil supplementation; IFO). The increasing number of double bonds in the lipid signals was the only clear change in the NMR spectra of the plasma
Fig. 3Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis with the most common fatty acids highlighted in panels A, B and D. a Fatty acid composition of the fish (□)—and placebo oil (■) capsules measured by GC-MS. b Typical FAME profile of blood plasma from a subject. The shown sample is from the BPO group. c Score plot of PLS-DA model between the baseline and 12-week time point of the fish oil group (BFO vs. IFO; Q2 = 0.63, R2 = 0.68. d Loading plot driving the separation shown in c
Significant changes in FAMEs, with the intervention cause and direction of the changes
| Fatty acid | Change in dataset |
|---|---|
| C16:1n-9c | Reduced with fish oil supplementation |
| C20:5n-3 | Increased with fish oil supplementation |
| C22:5 | Reduced with weight loss at 12 & 24 weeks |
| C20:1n-9 | Reduced with weight loss at 12 weeks |
| C18:1n-7c | Increased with weight loss (in placebo group only) |
Fig. 4a Example of the LC-MS measurement of a lipid extract from plasma. b PCA plot demonstrating the reproducibility of the LC-MS data. Each symbol represents a sample from the baseline of the placebo oil group and was injected three times. The technical repeats cluster together indicating that the variation between the samples is much bigger than the technical variation even if the samples were acquired over several days
Fig. 5a Scores plot of a PLS-DA model (Q2 = 0.85; R2 = 0.90) between IFO (Δ) and BPO (+). b Coefficients driving the separation in A displayed as a spectrum. The Black dots are the variable loadings while the grey lines represent the error bars. Multiple variables for each peak indicate that the whole signal is changing. The horizontal black lines were used as a threshold and loading higher that that were considered significant
Fig. 6Q2 of all pairwise comparisons between the nine groups of the study. Note the fish oil is most different from all other groups. I = intermediate, B = baseline, F = final timepoint; C = control, PO = placebo oil, FO = fish oil
Summary of significant changes in LC-MS peaks between groups
| Loading mass (M+H+) | RT | ID | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Increased with fish oil supplementation | 688.8 | 7.56 | DAG(40:10) |
| 780.7 | 4.83 | ||
| 806.6 | 5.04 | PC(38:6) | |
| 808.7 | 5.24 | ||
| 813.7 | 6.22 | SM(38:2) | |
| 834.7 | 5.49 | ||
| 920.8 | 7.72 | TAG(56:8) | |
| 894.8 | 7.66 | TAG(54:7)a | |
| 731.8 | 5.31 | ||
| 714.8 | 7.61 | DAG(42:11)a | |
| Decreased with fish oil supplementation | 784.7 | 5.31 | PC(36:3) |
| 812.7 | 5.76 | PC(38:3) | |
| 820.9 | 7.84 | TAG(48:2) | |
| 822.9 | 7.99 | TAG(48:1) | |
| 846.9 | 7.85 | TAG(50:3) | |
| 848.8 | 8.01 | TAG(50:2) | |
| 850.9 | 8.16 | TAG(50:1) | |
| 870.9 | 7.72 | TAG(52:5) | |
| 898.9 | 7.91 | TAG(54:5) | |
| 732.8 | 5.32 | ||
| 794.9 | 5.49 | ||
| Increased with weight loss (WLPO only) | 703.7 | 4.78 | SM(30:1) |
| 766.8 | 5.38 | ||
| Decreased with weight loss only | 878.8 | 8.31 |
Note: Tentative (low abundance/no MS/MS) or ambiguous identifications are in italics
TAG triacylglycerol, DAG diacylglycerol, PC glycerophosphatidyl choline, PS glycerophosphoserine, PE glycerophospho ethanolamine, PA glycerophospatydic acid, SM sphingomyeline
aDenotes signals at very low abundance in the raw data