Literature DB >> 2020858

Radiological evaluation of the acromioclavicular joint.

U Väätäinen1, A Pirinen, A Mäkelä.   

Abstract

X-ray measurement of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint may cause difficulties because of different projections and the lack of a reproducible measurement. In order to find the ideal measurement to estimate the state of the AC joint, 28 healthy adult volunteers were X-rayed. The least vulnerable measurement for errors in projection was the distance between the coracoid process and the upper part of the clavicle. The effect of stress was evaluated; the range of normal AC joint laxity was determined as 3 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1991        PMID： 2020858     DOI： 10.1007/bf00193822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN： 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  Acute, complete acromioclavicular separation.

Authors:  R J Imatani; J J Hanlon; G W Cady
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Biomechanical study of the ligamentous system of the acromioclavicular joint.

Authors:  K Fukuda; E V Craig; K N An; R H Cofield; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Fractures and dislocations about the shoulder.

Authors:  H Pavlov; R H Freiberger
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 0.800

4.  Acromioclavicular dislocation.

Authors:  F A Pettrone; R P Nirschl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Anatomical observations on the acromioclavicular joint and supporting ligaments.

Authors:  E G Salter; R J Nasca; B S Shelley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Radiographic joint space in normal acromioclavicular joints.

Authors:  C J Petersson; I Redlund-Johnell
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1983-06
  6 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Acromioclavicular joint injuries and reconstructions: a review of expected imaging findings and potential complications.

Authors:  Andrew C Kim; George Matcuk; Dakshesh Patel; John Itamura; Deborah Forrester; Eric White; Christopher J Gottsegen
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-05-26

Review 2.  Operative versus non-operative management following Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular separation: a meta-analysis of the current evidence base.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Rachel Chester; Eyiyemi O Pearse; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-02-23

3.  Methods used to assess the severity of acromioclavicular joint separations in Japan: a survey.

Authors:  Katsumi Takase; Yukihiko Hata; Yutaka Morisawa; Masafumi Goto; Sakae Tanaka; Junichiro Hamada; Kenji Hayashida; Yasunari Fujii; Toru Morihara; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Hiroaki Inui; Hiroyuki Shiozaki
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-02-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.