BACKGROUND: With growing use of Community Health Workers (CHWs) to reach underserved populations, there is a need for more information on training methods to prepare CHWs, particularly in a health educator role. OBJECTIVES: To describe procedures used to recruit, train, and evaluate CHWs in Project Sugar 2, a randomized controlled trial of a nurse case manager and CHW team intervention designed to improve diabetes care and control in a sample of 542 urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: CHWs received a Core Training on guidelines and procedures, didactic diabetes self-management education, and research protocol training. However, barriers to CHW implementation of the intervention were encountered, including CHW attrition, job performance and satisfaction issues, low self-confidence in knowledge and skills as educators, difficulties with maintaining a large caseload, and inefficiencies experienced in conducting home visits. To address barriers, the initial training was modified and condensed. A supplemental training utilizing participatory methods was developed collaboratively by CHWs and trainers to facilitate CHWs' designing of intervention materials in their own words and contributing processes for intervention implementation and quality control. RESULTS: The supplemental training resulted in CHW retention, satisfaction, confidence in skills, and feelings of ownership of the intervention. Participant satisfaction with care received from the CHWs and the Project Sugar 2 intervention was rated as high by 97% and 93% of responders, respectively. CONCLUSION:Core training in research intervention policies, procedures, and protocols, combined with an extended participatory training, led to effective preparation of laypersons to serve as CHWs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: With growing use of Community Health Workers (CHWs) to reach underserved populations, there is a need for more information on training methods to prepare CHWs, particularly in a health educator role. OBJECTIVES: To describe procedures used to recruit, train, and evaluate CHWs in Project Sugar 2, a randomized controlled trial of a nurse case manager and CHW team intervention designed to improve diabetes care and control in a sample of 542 urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: CHWs received a Core Training on guidelines and procedures, didactic diabetes self-management education, and research protocol training. However, barriers to CHW implementation of the intervention were encountered, including CHW attrition, job performance and satisfaction issues, low self-confidence in knowledge and skills as educators, difficulties with maintaining a large caseload, and inefficiencies experienced in conducting home visits. To address barriers, the initial training was modified and condensed. A supplemental training utilizing participatory methods was developed collaboratively by CHWs and trainers to facilitate CHWs' designing of intervention materials in their own words and contributing processes for intervention implementation and quality control. RESULTS: The supplemental training resulted in CHW retention, satisfaction, confidence in skills, and feelings of ownership of the intervention. Participant satisfaction with care received from the CHWs and the Project Sugar 2 intervention was rated as high by 97% and 93% of responders, respectively. CONCLUSION: Core training in research intervention policies, procedures, and protocols, combined with an extended participatory training, led to effective preparation of laypersons to serve as CHWs.
Authors: Lisa A Cooper; L Ebony Boulware; Edgar R Miller; Sherita Hill Golden; Kathryn A Carson; Gary Noronha; Mary Margaret Huizinga; Debra L Roter; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Lee R Bone; David M Levine; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Jeanne Charleston; Miyong Kim; Nae-Yuh Wang; Hanan Aboumatar; Jennifer P Halbert; Patti L Ephraim; Frederick L Brancati Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Clement K Gwede; Atalie A Ashley; Kara McGinnis; F Alejandro Montiel-Ishino; Maisha Standifer; Julie Baldwin; Coni Williams; Kevin B Sneed; Deanna Wathington; Lolita Dash-Pitts; B Lee Green Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2012-09-14
Authors: Tiffany L Gary; Marian Batts-Turner; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Lee R Bone; Nae-Yuh Wang; David M Levine; Neil R Powe; Christopher D Saudek; Martha N Hill; Maura McGuire; Frederick L Brancati Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-10-26
Authors: Raegan W Durant; Qiana L Brown; Andrea L Cherrington; Lynn J Andreae; Claudia M Hardy; Isabel C Scarinci Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Sarah Hamid; Shira Dunsiger; Andrew Seiden; Ofeira Nu'usolia; John Tuitele; Judith D DePue; Stephen T McGarvey Journal: Chronic Illn Date: 2013-10-01
Authors: Linda Haas; Melinda Maryniuk; Joni Beck; Carla E Cox; Paulina Duker; Laura Edwards; Edwin B Fisher; Lenita Hanson; Daniel Kent; Leslie Kolb; Sue McLaughlin; Eric Orzeck; John D Piette; Andrew S Rhinehart; Russell Rothman; Sara Sklaroff; Donna Tomky; Gretchen Youssef Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Linda Haas; Melinda Maryniuk; Joni Beck; Carla E Cox; Paulina Duker; Laura Edwards; Edwin B Fisher; Lenita Hanson; Daniel Kent; Leslie Kolb; Sue McLaughlin; Eric Orzeck; John D Piette; Andrew S Rhinehart; Russell Rothman; Sara Sklaroff; Donna Tomky; Gretchen Youssef Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 19.112