Literature DB >> 20207663

A randomized evaluation of loss and gain frames in an invitation to screening for type 2 diabetes: effects on attendance, anxiety and self-rated health.

Paul Park1, Rebecca K Simmons, A Toby Prevost, Simon J Griffin.   

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial in two general practices in Cambridgeshire compared the effect of loss and gain framed messages in an invitation to screening for type 2 diabetes on uptake and subsequent anxiety and self-rated health. High risk individuals aged 40-69 years were randomized to receive loss (n = 57) or gain (n = 59) framed screening invitations. A postal questionnaire was sent to all participants, including non-attenders, after six weeks. There were no significant differences in attendance, mean state anxiety, self-rated health or illness representation between the loss and gain frame arms. Framing of information in diabetes screening invitations does not influence uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207663     DOI: 10.1177/1359105309344896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  5 in total

1.  Recommendations on screening for type 2 diabetes in adults.

Authors:  Kevin Pottie; Alejandra Jaramillo; Gabriela Lewin; Jim Dickinson; Neil Bell; Paula Brauer; Lesley Dunfield; Michel Joffres; Harminder Singh; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  A Scoping Review of Behavioral Economic Interventions for Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Kullgren; Dina Hafez; Allison Fedewa; Michele Heisler
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Effectiveness and uptake of screening programmes for coronary heart disease and diabetes: a realist review of design components used in interventions.

Authors:  Carol Holland; Yvonne Cooper; Rachel Shaw; Helen Pattison; Richard Cooke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Non-participation in population-based disease prevention programs in general practice.

Authors:  Berber Koopmans; Mark M J Nielen; François G Schellevis; Joke C Korevaar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Response Rates and Diagnostic Yield of Screening for Type 2 Diabetes and Those at High Risk of Diabetes.

Authors:  Kamlesh Khunti; Hamidreza Mani; Felix Achana; Nicola Cooper; Laura J Gray; Melanie J Davies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.