Literature DB >> 20207551

Improved results after the primary repair of interrupted aortic arch: impact of a new management protocol with isolated cerebral perfusion.

Tomas Tlaskal1, Pavel Vojtovic, Oleg Reich, Bohumil Hucin, Roman Gebauer, Vladimir Kucera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse results and risk factors of death after the repair of the interrupted aortic arch, and to compare results obtained with the use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest versus isolated cerebral perfusion.
METHODS: The primary repair of the interrupted aortic arch and associated heart lesions was performed in 50 consecutive patients. The median age was 5 days and the mean weight was 3.1+/-0.6 kg. The interrupted aortic arch was of type A in 12 (24%) patients, type B in 37 (74%) and type C in one (2%) patient. Ventricular septal defect was present in 48 (96%) patients, subaortic stenosis in 15 (30%), truncus arteriosus in 14 (28%), transposition of the great arteries in two (4%), aortopulmonary window in two (4%) and double-outlet right ventricle in one (2%). The surgery consisted of reconstruction of the aortic arch by direct anastomosis and repair of associated heart lesions. In 25 (50%) patients, aortic arch reconstruction was performed using hypothermic circulatory arrest (group I) and in 25 by isolated cerebral perfusion (group II). The duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping and circulatory arrest or isolated cerebral perfusion was 191+/-46 min, 90+/-24 min and 40+/-14 min, respectively, in group I; and 194+/-39 min, 74+/-20 min and 31+/-6 min, respectively, in group II.
RESULTS: There were 10 (20%) deaths in this series, eight (32%) in group I and two (8%) in group II. Out of 12 patients operated before 1995, seven (58%) patients died; and out of 38 patients operated between 1995 and 2009, three (8%) patients died (p=0.008). By Cox multifactorial analysis, the earlier date of operation represented the only risk factor of death (p=0.037). Twelve (71%) survivors in group I and five (22%) survivors in group II required re-intervention, most often for subaortic stenosis, aortic arch obstruction or conduit obstruction. All patients remain in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II at median 12.6 years in group I, and 1.7 years in group II, respectively, after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Interrupted aortic arch can be repaired in neonates with a mortality of 5-10%. The results depend on experience. Isolated cerebral perfusion was joined with decreased mortality but it did not influence the occurrence of neurological complications. Copyright 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207551     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

1.  Single institutional experience of interrupted aortic arch repair over 28 years.

Authors:  Takeshi Shinkawa; Robert D B Jaquiss; Michiaki Imamura
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-01-27

2.  Morbidity in children and adolescents after surgical correction of truncus arteriosus communis.

Authors:  Michael L O'Byrne; Laura Mercer-Rosa; Huaqing Zhao; Xuemei Zhang; Wei Yang; Amy Cassedy; Mark A Fogel; Jack Rychik; Ronn E Tanel; Bradley S Marino; Stephen Paridon; Elizabeth Goldmuntz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Repair of isolated aortic coarctation over two decades: impact of surgical approach and associated arch hypoplasia.

Authors:  Takahisa Sakurai; John Stickley; Oliver Stümper; Natasha Khan; Timothy J Jones; David J Barron; William J Brawn
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-24

4.  Proximal Descending Thoracic Aortic Pseudoaneurysm in a 24-Year-Old Man after 2 Childhood Repairs of Interrupted Aortic Arch.

Authors:  Saleh A Alnasser; Angela H Martin; Ourania A Preventza; Joseph S Coselli; Kim I de la Cruz
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-02-01

5.  Aortic arch obstruction neonates with biventricular physiology: left-open compared to closed inter-atrial communication during primary repair--a retrospective study.

Authors:  André Rüffer; Caroline Bechtold; Ariawan Purbojo; Okan Toka; Martin Glöckler; Sven Dittrich; Robert Anton Cesnjevar
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  MHCA with SACP versus DHCA in Pediatric Aortic Arch Surgery: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ling Xie; Yan Xu; Guijin Huang; Mao Ye; Xiao Hu; Shiyu Shu; Harness Lynn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.