OBJECTIVES: To establish the theoretical and perceived links between area regeneration and health in a Scottish context in order to inform a comprehensive evaluation of regeneration activity. The evaluation will include health outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed method combining and comparing key informant interviews with policy analysis. METHODS: Analysis of identified links between elements of regeneration activity and health was undertaken of published policies and strategies which described regeneration for Scotland and the city of Glasgow. Interviews with key informants explored their understanding of the inputs to regeneration, and the pathways between regeneration and better health outcomes. RESULTS: The policy analysis and interviews revealed a holistic approach to a complex problem. Both identified a need for action to improve housing, neighbourhoods and services, education, employment, community participation and social issues. Improved health was identified as an emergent property. Interviewees identified a need to augment the established structural components with a more person-centred approach, fostering confidence and higher aspirations, but were uncertain how to achieve this. The interviews revealed a lack of confidence that current practice would deliver all the components of the holistic model. CONCLUSIONS: A holistic model of regeneration appears to inform policy, but is proving difficult to deliver. Improved health and reduced health inequalities were not primary objectives but emergent properties. In light of this, the ability of regeneration to actively maximize positive health impacts, particularly if this requires focused planning or opportunity costs to other activities, is questioned. Copyright (c) 2010 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: To establish the theoretical and perceived links between area regeneration and health in a Scottish context in order to inform a comprehensive evaluation of regeneration activity. The evaluation will include health outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed method combining and comparing key informant interviews with policy analysis. METHODS: Analysis of identified links between elements of regeneration activity and health was undertaken of published policies and strategies which described regeneration for Scotland and the city of Glasgow. Interviews with key informants explored their understanding of the inputs to regeneration, and the pathways between regeneration and better health outcomes. RESULTS: The policy analysis and interviews revealed a holistic approach to a complex problem. Both identified a need for action to improve housing, neighbourhoods and services, education, employment, community participation and social issues. Improved health was identified as an emergent property. Interviewees identified a need to augment the established structural components with a more person-centred approach, fostering confidence and higher aspirations, but were uncertain how to achieve this. The interviews revealed a lack of confidence that current practice would deliver all the components of the holistic model. CONCLUSIONS: A holistic model of regeneration appears to inform policy, but is proving difficult to deliver. Improved health and reduced health inequalities were not primary objectives but emergent properties. In light of this, the ability of regeneration to actively maximize positive health impacts, particularly if this requires focused planning or opportunity costs to other activities, is questioned. Copyright (c) 2010 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Matt Egan; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Ade Kearns; Carol Tannahill; Martins Kalacs; Lyndal Bond Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Matt Egan; Ade Kearns; Phil Mason; Carol Tannahill; Lyndal Bond; Jennie Coyle; Sheila Beck; Fiona Crawford; Phil Hanlon; Louise Lawson; Jennifer McLean; Mark Petticrew; Elena Sautkina; Hilary Thomson; David Walsh Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 4.615