Literature DB >> 20207064

Recurrent miscarriage: Are three miscarriages one too many? Analysis of a Scottish population-based database of 151,021 pregnancies.

Sohinee Bhattacharya1, John Townend, Siladitya Bhattacharya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of further miscarriage or preterm delivery in women with a history of miscarriages in previous pregnancies, adjusting for maternal age and smoking. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using all women with first pregnancies recorded between 1950 and 2000 in the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank.Exposure was one or more spontaneous miscarriages, while outcomes assessed were further miscarriage or preterm delivery.
RESULTS: There were 143,595 pregnancies with none, 6,577 with one, 700 with two, 115 with three and 24 with four consecutive previous miscarriages. The odds of miscarriage were greater in pregnancies following one previous miscarriage than none {adj.O.R. 1.94 (95% C.I. 1.80, 2.09)}. The risk of miscarriage following two miscarriages was greater than in pregnancies following one {adj.O.R. 1.56 (95% C.I. 1.28, 1.90)}. However, there was no further significant increase in odds of miscarriage for pregnancies following three {adj.O.R. 1.37 (95% C.I. 0.86, 2.17)} previous consecutive miscarriages. Odds of spontaneous preterm delivery were greater following one miscarriage than none {adj.O.R. 1.52 (95% C.I. 1.36, 1.69)} but no further increases in risk were seen.
CONCLUSION: After adjusting for age and smoking, the risk of a further miscarriage increased sequentially in women who had one and two miscarriages. Three miscarriages did not increase the odds any further. One miscarriage was associated with an increased chance of spontaneous preterm delivery, but two or three miscarriages did not increase the odds any further. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207064     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  7 in total

1.  The role of FAS, FAS-L, BAX, and BCL-2 gene polymorphisms in determining susceptibility to unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Rafael Tomoya Michita; Francis Maria Báo Zambra; Lucas Rosa Fraga; Maria Teresa Sanseverino; Lavínia Schuler-Faccini; José Artur Bogo Chies; Priscila Vianna
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Aspirin and/or heparin for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage with or without inherited thrombophilia.

Authors:  Paulien G de Jong; Stef Kaandorp; Marcello Di Nisio; Mariëtte Goddijn; Saskia Middeldorp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-04

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of miscarriage and maternal exposure to tobacco smoke during pregnancy.

Authors:  Beth L Pineles; Edward Park; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Maternal sepsis: a Scottish population-based case-control study.

Authors:  C D Acosta; S Bhattacharya; D Tuffnell; J J Kurinczuk; M Knight
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Role of maternal age and pregnancy history in risk of miscarriage: prospective register based study.

Authors:  Maria C Magnus; Allen J Wilcox; Nils-Halvdan Morken; Clarice R Weinberg; Siri E Håberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-03-20

6.  Reliability of recurrent pregnancy loss diagnosis coding in the Swedish National Patient Register: a validation study.

Authors:  Emma Rasmark Roepke; Ole Bjarne Christiansen; Stefan R Hansson
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Application of chromosomal microarray analysis in products of miscarriage.

Authors:  Xiangyu Zhu; Jie Li; Yujie Zhu; Wanjun Wang; Xing Wu; Ying Yang; Leilei Gu; Yuanyuan Gu; Yali Hu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.009

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.