Literature DB >> 20206968

Quantitative loss of heterozygosity analysis for urothelial carcinoma detection and prognosis.

Delphine Collin-Chavagnac1, Christophe Marçais, Stephane Billon, Françoise Descotes, Eric Piaton, Myriam Decaussin, Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse, Alain Ruffion.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate loss of heterozygosity (LOH) using microsatellite polymorphism analysis as a diagnostic and prognostic marker at the time of transurethral resection and as a follow-up marker preceding cystoscopic evidence of recurrence compared with cytology.
METHODS: A total of 127 urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients were included. Tumors were staged and graded according to the International Union Against Cancer-tumor, node, metastases system and to the 2004 World Health Organization classification. LOH urinalysis was performed using 8 markers and marker-specific LOH thresholds. Thirty control samples, obtained from healthy volunteers, were used to determine the positive cut-off for each marker.
RESULTS: LOH was significantly more sensitive than cytology in low-grade (64.8% vs 38.5%, P <.001) and low-stage UC (68.6% vs 45.5%, P <.001). The cumulative sensitivity of cytology and LOH reached 74.7% (P <.001) for low-grade and 80.2% (P <.001) for low-stage tumors. Both urinary LOH at TP53 and chromosome 9p markers were associated with an increased risk of recurrence (relative risk = 1.73 [1.30-2.31], P = .0002) and occurred more frequently in the initial urine samples of patients who later relapsed from primary tumors (36.4% vs 0.0%, P <.05 and 57.6% vs 15.8%, P = .0001). Among 32 relapse patients, LOH was positive alongside cystoscopy in 25 of 32 cases and tested positive before cystoscopy detected recurrence in a further 5 of 25 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: UC diagnosis and monitoring would greatly benefit from supplementing conventional cytology with LOH urinalysis, using a panel of 8 microsatellite markers with specific threshold levels. Given the limitations of both cystoscopy and cytology, novel molecular markers are needed for detection and follow-up of UC. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20206968     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Non-invasive prediction of recurrence in bladder cancer by detecting somatic TERT promoter mutations in urine.

Authors:  Françoise Descotes; Norelyakin Kara; Myriam Decaussin-Petrucci; Eric Piaton; Florence Geiguer; Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse; Jean E Terrier; Jonathan Lopez; Alain Ruffion
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  EORTC risk tables - their usefulness in the assessment of recurrence and progression risk in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Polish patients.

Authors:  Edyta M Borkowska; Adam Jędrzejczyk; Piotr Marks; James W F Catto; Bogdan Kałużewski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2013-04-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.