Literature DB >> 20206715

Total pulmonary vein occlusion complicating pulmonary vein isolation: diagnosis and treatment.

Lourdes R Prieto1, Yu Kawai, Sarah E Worley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) complicating pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) can progress to total pulmonary vein occlusion (PVO). Little is known about the accuracy of noninvasive diagnosis and treatment of PVO.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to study the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive testing and the feasibility and outcome of percutaneous intervention for PVO.
METHODS: Computed tomography (CT)-diagnosed and angiographically confirmed PVOs were identified from percutaneous interventions for PVS complicating PVI between December 2000 and December 2008. Diagnostic accuracy of CT combined with lung perfusion scan was studied. Outcome of percutaneous intervention was reviewed.
RESULTS: CT diagnosed "PVO" in 53 PVs, with only 20 of 53 determined angiographically to be totally occluded. True PVO had lower perfusion (4.0%) compared with CT-diagnosed "PVO" (7.3%, P = .024). Recanalization was attempted in 9 and successful in 8. Of the 8 patients, 7 were dilated with 4.5- to 7-mm balloons and 1 was stented primarily (7 mm). At repeat catheterization 2.9 +/- 0.8 months later, 6 of 7 pulmonary veins (PVs) were stented to 5 to 10 mm. At follow-up of 11.3 +/- 8.7 months, all but 1 PV remained patent (mean diameter 6.9 +/- 1.7 mm). Flow to the lung quadrant increased from 5.6% before recanalization to 12.2% at last follow-up (P = .016). Symptoms improved in all but one patient.
CONCLUSION: PVO is overestimated by CT. Quantification of lung perfusion improves diagnostic accuracy, but angiography remains the gold standard. Recanalization of PVO can be attempted when a remnant of the PV is visible. Good mid-term patency rates and improved perfusion were observed with a two-stage approach of initial dilation and subsequent stenting. Longer follow-up and larger numbers of patients are needed to better understand when to intervene for PVO. Copyright 2010 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20206715     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  7 in total

1.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy for massive hemoptysis caused by complete pulmonary vein occlusion after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Shizhao Cheng; Xike Lu; Jing Wang; Ting Liu; Xun Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  The incidence, diagnosis, and management of pulmonary vein stenosis as a complication of atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Armand Rostamian; Sanjiv M Narayan; Louise Thomson; Michael Fishbein; Robert J Siegel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Management Of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Following Catheter Ablation Of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Narendra Kumar; Ismail Aksoy; Laurent Pison; Carl Timmermans; Jos Maessen; Harry Crijns
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-06-30

4.  Non-interventional Management of Symptomatic Pulmonary Vein Occlusion after Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Logan Bittinger; Anthony Tang
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-04-14

5.  Techniques for transcatheter recanalization of completely occluded vessels and pathways in patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Larry A Latson; Athar M Qureshi
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-07

Review 6.  Use of Cardiac Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Case Management of Atrial Fibrillation with Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Hee Gone Lee; Jaemin Shim; Jong Il Choi; Young Hoon Kim; Yu Whan Oh; Sung Ho Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 7.  Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Five Case Reports and Literature Review.

Authors:  Hai-Wen Lu; Ping Wei; Sen Jiang; Shu-Yi Gu; Li-Chao Fan; Shuo Liang; Xiaobin Ji; Bhavana Rajbanshi; Jin-Fu Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.