Literature DB >> 20206650

Field detection of avian influenza virus in wild birds: evaluation of a portable rRT-PCR system and freeze-dried reagents.

John Y Takekawa1, Samuel A Iverson, Annie K Schultz, Nichola J Hill, Carol J Cardona, Walter M Boyce, Joseph P Dudley.   

Abstract

Wild birds have been implicated in the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAIV) of the H5N1 subtype, prompting surveillance along migratory flyways. Sampling of wild birds is often conducted in remote regions, but results are often delayed because of limited local analytical capabilities, difficulties with sample transportation and permitting, or problems keeping samples cold in the field. In response to these challenges, the performance of a portable real-time, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) unit (RAPID((R)), Idaho Technologies, Salt Lake City, UT) that employed lyophilized reagents (Influenza A Target 1 Taqman; ASAY-ASY-0109, Idaho Technologies) was compared to virus isolation combined with real-time RT-PCR conducted in a laboratory. This study included both field- and experimental-based sampling. Field samples were collected from migratory shorebirds captured in northern California, while experimental samples were prepared by spiking fecal material with an H6N2 AIV isolate. Results indicated that the portable rRT-PCR unit had equivalent specificity to virus isolation with no false positives, but sensitivity was compromised at low viral titers. Use of portable rRT-PCR with lyophilized reagents may expedite surveillance results, paving the way to a better understanding of wild bird involvement in HPAIV H5N1 transmission. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20206650     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.02.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  5 in total

1.  Rapid diagnosis of avian influenza virus in wild birds: use of a portable rRT-PCR and freeze-dried reagents in the field.

Authors:  John Y Takekawa; Nichola J Hill; Annie K Schultz; Samuel A Iverson; Carol J Cardona; Walter M Boyce; Joseph P Dudley
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Nucleic-acid testing, new platforms and nanotechnology for point-of-decision diagnosis of animal pathogens.

Authors:  Fernando Teles; Luís Fonseca
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2015

3.  Field-Deployable Reverse Transcription-Insulated Isothermal PCR (RT-iiPCR) Assay for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus.

Authors:  A Ambagala; M Fisher; M Goolia; C Nfon; T Furukawa-Stoffer; R Ortega Polo; O Lung
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 5.005

Review 4.  Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Farm Animal Diseases: From Biosensors to Integrated Lab-on-Chip Devices.

Authors:  Georgios Manessis; Athanasios I Gelasakis; Ioannis Bossis
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-26

5.  Evaluation of Two Lyophilized Molecular Assays to Rapidly Detect Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Directly from Clinical Samples in Field Settings.

Authors:  E L A Howson; B Armson; M Madi; C J Kasanga; S Kandusi; R Sallu; E Chepkwony; A Siddle; P Martin; J Wood; V Mioulet; D P King; T Lembo; S Cleaveland; V L Fowler
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.005

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.