Literature DB >> 20206313

Serum transforming growth factor-beta 1 is not a robust biomarker of incident and progressive radiographic osteoarthritis at the hip and knee: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.

A E Nelson1, Y M Golightly, V B Kraus, T Stabler, J B Renner, C G Helmick, J M Jordan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test whether serum transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta1) predicts incident and progressive hip or knee radiographic OA (rOA).
METHODS: Serum TGF-beta1 was measured for 330 participants aged 45 years and older in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project, with paired longitudinal films available for 618 hips and 658 knees. Incident and progressive rOA were defined using Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade as well as osteophyte (OST) and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores. Natural logarithm transformation was used to produce near-normal distributions for continuous TGF-beta1 (lnTGF-beta1). Separate multivariable Weibull regression models were used to provide hazard ratios (HRs) for a 1-unit increase lnTGF-beta1 with each rOA outcome, accounting for variable follow-up times and clustering by individual, adjusted for age, race, gender, and body mass index (BMI). Interaction terms were considered statistically significant at P<0.10.
RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) age of the sample was 61.9+/-9.7 years, the mean BMI was 30.3+/-6.9 kg/m(2), with 60.6% women and 42.4% AA. The mean (+/-SD) TGF-beta1 was 17.8+/-6.1 ng/ml; follow-up time was 6.1+/-1.3 years. There were no significant interactions by race or gender. HRs showed no significant relationship between lnTGF-beta1 and incident or progressive rOA, OST, or JSN, at the knee or the hip.
CONCLUSIONS: Levels of TGF-beta1 do not predict incident or progressive rOA, OST, or JSN at the hip or knee in this longitudinal, population-based study, making it unlikely that TGF-beta1 will be a robust biomarker for rOA in future studies. Copyright 2010 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20206313      PMCID: PMC2873050          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  29 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D L Scott; P Gishen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Osteoarthritis of the hip: agreement between joint space width measurements on standing and supine conventional radiographs.

Authors:  G R Auleley; B Rousselin; X Ayral; R Edouard-Noel; M Dougados; P Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  An analysis of 14 molecular markers for monitoring osteoarthritis. Relationship of the markers to clinical end-points.

Authors:  I G Otterness; E Weiner; A C Swindell; R O Zimmerer; M Ionescu; A R Poole
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  TGF-beta1 as a prognostic factor in the process of early osteoarthrosis in the rabbit knee.

Authors:  A Fahlgren; B Andersson; K Messner
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Osteoarthritis-like changes in the murine knee joint resulting from intra-articular transforming growth factor-beta injections.

Authors:  H M van Beuningen; H L Glansbeek; P M van der Kraan; W B van den Berg
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Inhibition of endogenous TGF-beta during experimental osteoarthritis prevents osteophyte formation and impairs cartilage repair.

Authors:  Alwin Scharstuhl; Harrie L Glansbeek; Henk M van Beuningen; Elly L Vitters; Peter M van der Kraan; Wim B van den Berg
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 7.  Is knee radiography useful for studying the efficacy of a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug in humans?

Authors:  Steven A Mazzuca; Kenneth D Brandt
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 8.  The impact of arthritis in rural populations.

Authors:  J M Jordan; G F Linder; J B Renner; J G Fryer
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1995-12

9.  Different cytokine profiles in the synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondylarthropathies.

Authors:  J F Schlaak; I Pfers; K H Meyer Zum Büschenfelde; E Märker-Hermann
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.473

10.  Transforming growth factor-beta 1 hyperexpression in African-American hypertensives: A novel mediator of hypertension and/or target organ damage.

Authors:  M Suthanthiran; B Li; J O Song; R Ding; V K Sharma; J E Schwartz; P August
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  What is the utility of biomarkers for assessing the pathophysiology of hip osteoarthritis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Nepple; Kayla M Thomason; Tonya W An; Marcie Harris-Hayes; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  New developments in osteoarthritis. Sex differences in magnetic resonance imaging-based biomarkers and in those of joint metabolism.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Maleki-Fischbach; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 3.  What Are the Prognostic Factors for Radiographic Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alex N Bastick; Janneke N Belo; Jos Runhaar; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review.

Authors:  C H Teirlinck; D M J Dorleijn; P K Bos; J B M Rijkels-Otters; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; P A J Luijsterburg
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.156

5.  Identification of potential prognostic markers for knee osteoarthritis by serum proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Takinami; Shinya Yoshimatsu; Takaoki Uchiumi; Tomoko Toyosaki-Maeda; Atsushi Morita; Takeshi Ishihara; Shoji Yamane; Isao Fukuda; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Yoshito Numata; Naoshi Fukui
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2013-07-29

6.  Immune response and innervation signatures in aseptic hip implant loosening.

Authors:  Daniel M Vasconcelos; Manuel Ribeiro-da-Silva; António Mateus; Cecília Juliana Alves; Gil Costa Machado; Joana Machado-Santos; Diogo Paramos-de-Carvalho; Inês S Alencastre; Rui Henrique; Gilberto Costa; Mário A Barbosa; Meriem Lamghari
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 7.  Subchondral bone proteomics in osteoarthritis: Current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Pok Man Boris Chan; Lin Zhu; Chun Yi Wen; Kwong Yuen Chiu
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.191

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.