Literature DB >> 20206213

Facial expression arousal level modulates facial mimicry.

Tomomi Fujimura1, Wataru Sato, Naoto Suzuki.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of facial expression arousal level and mode of presentation on facial mimicry. High- and low-arousal facial expressions indicating pleasant and unpleasant emotions were presented both statically and dynamically. Participants' facial electromyographic (EMG) reactions were recorded from the zygomatic major and corrugator supercilii muscles. Stronger zygomatic major muscle activity was evoked for high- compared to low-arousal pleasant expressions. Comparable activity was induced in the corrugator supercilii muscle in response to both high- and low-arousal unpleasant expressions, and this was true for both dynamic and static presentations. These results suggest that the arousal levels of pleasant, but not unpleasant, facial expressions can enhance facial mimicry. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20206213     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  7 in total

1.  Facial EMG responses to emotional expressions are related to emotion perception ability.

Authors:  Janina Künecke; Andrea Hildebrandt; Guillermo Recio; Werner Sommer; Oliver Wilhelm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Sex Differences in Affective Facial Reactions Are Present in Childhood.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Vania Veroni; Sonia Boria; Giancarlo Tassinari; Luca Turella
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23

Review 3.  Collective Rhythm as an Emergent Property During Human Social Coordination.

Authors:  Arodi Farrera; Gabriel Ramos-Fernández
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Relationships among facial mimicry, emotional experience, and emotion recognition.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Tomomi Fujimura; Takanori Kochiyama; Naoto Suzuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Source unreliability decreases but does not cancel the impact of social information on metacognitive evaluations.

Authors:  Amélie Jacquot; Terry Eskenazi; Edith Sales-Wuillemin; Benoît Montalan; Joëlle Proust; Julie Grèzes; Laurence Conty
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-14

6.  Neural measures of the causal role of observers' facial mimicry on visual working memory for facial expressions.

Authors:  Paola Sessa; Arianna Schiano Lomoriello; Roy Luria
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  How Do Induced Affective States Bias Emotional Contagion to Faces? A Three-Dimensional Model.

Authors:  Andrés Pinilla; Ricardo M Tamayo; Jorge Neira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.