Literature DB >> 20206187

Sperm competition games: sperm size (mass) and number under raffle and displacement, and the evolution of P2.

G A Parker1, S Immler, S Pitnick, T R Birkhead.   

Abstract

We examine models for evolution of sperm size (i.e. mass m) and number (s) under three mechanisms of sperm competition at low 'risk' levels: (i) raffle with no constraint on space available for competing sperm, (ii) direct displacement mainly by seminal fluid, and (iii) direct displacement mainly by sperm mass. Increasing sperm mass increases a sperm's 'competitive weight' against rival sperm through a diminishing returns function, r(m). ESS total ejaculate expenditure (the product m(*)s(*)) increases in all three models with sperm competition risk, q. If r(m), or ratio r'(m)/r(m), is independent of ESS sperm numbers, ESS sperm mass remains constant, and the sperm mass/number ratio (m(*)/s(*)) therefore decreases with risk. Dependency of sperm mass on risk can arise if r(m) depends on competing sperm density (sperm number / space available for sperm competition). Such dependencies generate complex relationships between sperm mass and number with risk, depending both on the mechanism and how sperm density affects r(m). While numbers always increase with risk, mass can either increase or decrease, but m(*)/s(*) typically decreases with risk unless sperm density strongly influences r(m). Where there is no extrinsic loading due to mating order, ESS paternity of the second (i.e. last) male to mate (P(2)) under displacement always exceeds 0.5, and increases with risk (in the raffle P(2)=0.5). Caution is needed when seeking evidence for a sperm size-number trade off. Although size and number trade-off independently against effort spent on acquiring matings, their product, m(*)s(*), is invariant or fixed at a given risk level, effectively generating a size-number trade off. However, unless controlled for the effects of risk, the relation between m(*) and s(*) can be either positive or negative (a positive relation is usually taken as evidence against a size-number trade off). Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20206187     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  17 in total

1.  Female reproductive tract form drives the evolution of complex sperm morphology.

Authors:  Dawn M Higginson; Kelly B Miller; Kari A Segraves; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sperm number trumps sperm size in mammalian ejaculate evolution.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Fertilization mode drives sperm length evolution across the animal tree of life.

Authors:  Ariel F Kahrl; Rhonda R Snook; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 4.  Sperm and alternative reproductive tactics: a review of existing theory and empirical data.

Authors:  Matthew C Kustra; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  How sperm competition shapes the evolution of testes and sperm: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Raïssa A de Boer; Jonathan P Evans; Joseph L Tomkins; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Conceptual developments in sperm competition: a very brief synopsis.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Sperm competition games when males invest in paternal care.

Authors:  Gustavo S Requena; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Resolving variation in the reproductive tradeoff between sperm size and number.

Authors:  Simone Immler; Scott Pitnick; Geoff A Parker; Kate L Durrant; Stefan Lüpold; Sara Calhim; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Sperm competition and the evolution of sperm design in mammals.

Authors:  Maximiliano Tourmente; Montserrat Gomendio; Eduardo R S Roldan
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Can Sexual Selection Drive the Evolution of Sperm Cell Structure?

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.