PURPOSE: There is increasing evidence that genetic factors regulating the recognition and/or repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are responsible for differences in radiosensitivity among patients. Genetically defined DSB repair capacities are supposed to determine patients' individual susceptibility to develop adverse normal tissue reactions after radiotherapy. In a preclinical murine model, we analyzed the impact of different DSB repair capacities on the cumulative DNA damage in normal tissues during the course of fractionated irradiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Different strains of mice with defined genetic backgrounds (SCID(-/-) homozygous, ATM(-/-) homozygous, ATM(+/-)heterozygous, and ATM(+/+)wild-type mice) were subjected to single (2 Gy) or fractionated irradiation (5 x 2 Gy). By enumerating gammaH2AX foci, the formation and rejoining of DSBs were analyzed in organs representative of both early-responding (small intestine) and late-responding tissues (lung, kidney, and heart). RESULTS: In repair-deficient SCID(-/-) and ATM(-/-)homozygous mice, large proportions of radiation-induced DSBs remained unrepaired after each fraction, leading to the pronounced accumulation of residual DNA damage after fractionated irradiation, similarly visible in early- and late-responding tissues. The slight DSB repair impairment of ATM(+/-)heterozygous mice was not detectable after single-dose irradiation but resulted in a significant increase in unrepaired DSBs during the fractionated irradiation scheme. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation-induced DSBs accumulate similarly in acute- and late-responding tissues during fractionated irradiation, whereas the whole extent of residual DNA damage depends decisively on the underlying genetically defined DSB repair capacity. Moreover, our data indicate that even minor impairments in DSB repair lead to exceeding DNA damage accumulation during fractionated irradiation and thus may have a significant impact on normal tissue responses in clinical radiotherapy. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: There is increasing evidence that genetic factors regulating the recognition and/or repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are responsible for differences in radiosensitivity among patients. Genetically defined DSB repair capacities are supposed to determine patients' individual susceptibility to develop adverse normal tissue reactions after radiotherapy. In a preclinical murine model, we analyzed the impact of different DSB repair capacities on the cumulative DNA damage in normal tissues during the course of fractionated irradiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Different strains of mice with defined genetic backgrounds (SCID(-/-) homozygous, ATM(-/-) homozygous, ATM(+/-)heterozygous, and ATM(+/+)wild-type mice) were subjected to single (2 Gy) or fractionated irradiation (5 x 2 Gy). By enumerating gammaH2AX foci, the formation and rejoining of DSBs were analyzed in organs representative of both early-responding (small intestine) and late-responding tissues (lung, kidney, and heart). RESULTS: In repair-deficient SCID(-/-) and ATM(-/-)homozygous mice, large proportions of radiation-induced DSBs remained unrepaired after each fraction, leading to the pronounced accumulation of residual DNA damage after fractionated irradiation, similarly visible in early- and late-responding tissues. The slight DSB repair impairment of ATM(+/-)heterozygous mice was not detectable after single-dose irradiation but resulted in a significant increase in unrepaired DSBs during the fractionated irradiation scheme. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation-induced DSBs accumulate similarly in acute- and late-responding tissues during fractionated irradiation, whereas the whole extent of residual DNA damage depends decisively on the underlying genetically defined DSB repair capacity. Moreover, our data indicate that even minor impairments in DSB repair lead to exceeding DNA damage accumulation during fractionated irradiation and thus may have a significant impact on normal tissue responses in clinical radiotherapy. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Christopher D Willey; Ashley N Gilbert; Joshua C Anderson; George Yancey Gillespie Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Javed Mahmood; Salomeh Jelveh; Victoria Calveley; Asif Zaidi; Susan R Doctrow; Richard P Hill Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: K E Applegate; W Rühm; A Wojcik; M Bourguignon; A Brenner; K Hamasaki; T Imai; M Imaizumi; T Imaoka; S Kakinuma; T Kamada; N Nishimura; N Okonogi; K Ozasa; C E Rübe; A Sadakane; R Sakata; Y Shimada; K Yoshida; S Bouffler Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2020-03-07 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Emad A Ahmed; Diane Agay; Gerrit Schrock; Michel Drouet; Viktor Meineke; Harry Scherthan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 3.240