PURPOSE: Several in vitro studies suggest that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers present increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Different assays for the assessment of deoxyribonucleic acid double-strand break repair capacity have been used, but results are rather inconsistent. Given the concerns about the possible risks of breast screening with mammography in mutation carrier women and the potentially damaging effects of radiotherapy, the purpose of this study was to further investigate the radiosensitivity of this population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity assay was used to assess chromosomal breaks in lymphocyte cultures after exposure to 1 Gy. A group of familiar breast cancer patients carrying a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene (n = 15) and a group of healthy mutation carriers (n = 5) were investigated and compared with a reference group of healthy women carrying no mutation (n = 21). RESULTS: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers had a significantly higher number of mean chromatid breaks per cell (p = 0.006) and a higher maximum number of breaks (p = 0.0001) as compared with their matched controls. Both healthy carriers and carriers with a cancer history were more radiosensitive than controls (p = 0.002 and p = 0.025, respectively). Age was not associated with increased radiosensitivity (p = 0.868). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers show enhanced radiosensitivity, presumably because of the involvement of the BRCA genes in deoxyribonucleic acid repair and cell cycle control mechanisms. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: Several in vitro studies suggest that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers present increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Different assays for the assessment of deoxyribonucleic acid double-strand break repair capacity have been used, but results are rather inconsistent. Given the concerns about the possible risks of breast screening with mammography in mutation carrier women and the potentially damaging effects of radiotherapy, the purpose of this study was to further investigate the radiosensitivity of this population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity assay was used to assess chromosomal breaks in lymphocyte cultures after exposure to 1 Gy. A group of familiar breast cancerpatients carrying a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene (n = 15) and a group of healthy mutation carriers (n = 5) were investigated and compared with a reference group of healthy women carrying no mutation (n = 21). RESULTS:BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers had a significantly higher number of mean chromatid breaks per cell (p = 0.006) and a higher maximum number of breaks (p = 0.0001) as compared with their matched controls. Both healthy carriers and carriers with a cancer history were more radiosensitive than controls (p = 0.002 and p = 0.025, respectively). Age was not associated with increased radiosensitivity (p = 0.868). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers show enhanced radiosensitivity, presumably because of the involvement of the BRCA genes in deoxyribonucleic acid repair and cell cycle control mechanisms. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Kathryn P Lowry; Janie M Lee; Chung Y Kong; Pamela M McMahon; Michael E Gilmore; Jessica E Cott Chubiz; Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Paula D Ryan; Elissa M Ozanne; G Scott Gazelle Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Shenika V Poindexter; Vishruth K Reddy; Mukul K Mittal; Amanda M Williams; M Kay Washington; Elizabeth Harris; Amanda Mah; Scott W Hiebert; Kshipra Singh; Rupesh Chaturvedi; Keith T Wilson; P Kay Lund; Christopher S Williams Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Danny Vesprini; Steven A Narod; John Trachtenberg; Juanita Crook; Farid Jalali; John Preiner; Srikala Sridhar; Robert G Bristow Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Bhavana V Chapman; Diane Liu; Yu Shen; Oluwafikayo O Olamigoke; David S Lakomy; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Shane R Stecklein; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Scott J Bright; Isabelle Bedrosian; Jennifer K Litton; Benjamin D Smith; Wendy A Woodward; George H Perkins; Karen E Hoffman; Michael C Stauder; Eric A Strom; Banu K Arun; Simona F Shaitelman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-10-03 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Lucia Guidugli; Aura Carreira; Sandrine M Caputo; Asa Ehlen; Alvaro Galli; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Susan L Neuhausen; Thomas V O Hansen; Fergus J Couch; Maaike P G Vreeswijk Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Francesca Galati; Flaminia Marzocca; Erica Bassetti; Maria L Luciani; Sharon Tan; Carlo Catalano; Federica Pediconi Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Konstantin J Dedes; Paul M Wilkerson; Daniel Wetterskog; Britta Weigelt; Alan Ashworth; Jorge S Reis-Filho Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Kienan I Savage; Kyle B Matchett; Eliana M Barros; Kevin M Cooper; Gareth W Irwin; Julia J Gorski; Katy S Orr; Jekaterina Vohhodina; Joy N Kavanagh; Angelina F Madden; Alexander Powell; Lorenzo Manti; Simon S McDade; Ben Ho Park; Kevin M Prise; Stuart A McIntosh; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Derek J Richard; Christopher T Elliott; D Paul Harkin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 12.701