| Literature DB >> 20205889 |
Sumei Zhao1, Jing Wang1, Xinlei Song1, Xi Zhang1, Changrong Ge1, Shizheng Gao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High dietary protein can reduce fat deposition in animal subcutaneous adipose tissue, but little is known about the mechanism.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20205889 PMCID: PMC2827416 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-7-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Composition of diets (%, as fed basis)
| LP1 | HP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Corn | 73.72 | 60.46 |
| Wheat bran | 10.00 | 15.00 |
| Soybean meal | 8.38 | 16.14 |
| Fish meal | 4.50 | 5.00 |
| Soybean oil | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Limestone | 0.90 | 0.90 |
| Salt | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Premix3 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Calculated nutritional composition4 | ||
| Crude protein | 14.00 | 18.00 |
| Total lysine | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| Digestive energy | 13.56 | 13.56 |
| Calcium | 0.64 | 0.64 |
| Total phosphorus | 0.55 | 0.55 |
| Available phosphorus | 0.29 | 0.29 |
1 LP: low protein diet.
2 HP: high protein diet
3Vitamin premix provided the following per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 8,267 IU; vitamin D2, 2,480 IU; vitamin E, 66 IU; menadionine [as menadionine pyrimidinol bisulfite complex], 6.2 mg; riboflavin, 10 mg; Ca d-pantothenic acid, 37 mg; niacin, 66 mg; vitamin B12, 45 μg; d-biotin, 331 μg; folic acid, 2.5 mg; pyridoxine, 3.31 mg; thiamine, 3.31 mg; vitamin C, 83 μg; Trace mineral premix provided the following per kilogram of diet: Zn, 127 mg; Fe, 127 mg; Mn, 20 mg; Cu, 12.7 mg; I0.80 mg, as zinc sulfate, ferrous sulfate, manganese sulfate, copper sulfate, ethylenediamine dihydriodide, respectively, with calcium carbonate as the carrier, providing 0.3 mg Se per kilogram of diet.
4 Nutritional compositions were calculated values based on China Feed Database.
Specific primers used for real-time quantitative PCR
| Gene name1 | Sequence | Ta | Product size (bp) | Genbank accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18S rRNA | F: 5'-GCGGCTTTGGTGACTCTA-3' | 60°C | 194 | |
| ACC | F: 5'-ATG TTT CGG CAG TCC CTG AT-3' | 60°C | 133 | |
| FAS | F: 5'-AGC CTA ACT CCT CGC TGC AAT-3' | 58°C | 196 bp | |
| SREBP-1 | F: 5'-GCG ACG GTG CCT CTG GTA GT-3' | 62°C | 218 bp | |
| LPL | F: 5'-AAC TTG TGG CTG CCC TAT-3' | 55°C | 367 bp | |
| HSL | F: 5'-GCT CCC ATC GTC AAG AAT C-3' | 55°C | 262 bp | |
| PPAR- | F: 5'-GAT TTC TCC AGC ATT TCC A-3' | 60°C | 184 bp | |
| CPT-1 | F: 5'-ATG GTG GGC GAC TAA CT-3' | 62°C | 321 bp | |
| A-FABP | F: 5'-CAG GAA AGT CAA GAG CAC CA-3' | 55°C | 227 bp |
1 All porcine gene sequences.
Effect of dietary protein on growth performance1
| 15-30 kg | 30-60 kg | 60-100 kg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daily feed intake (kg/d) | LP2 | 1.12 ± 0.01a | 1.80 ± 0.06b | 2.27 ± 0.08c |
| HP3 | 1.13 ± 0.04A | 1.82 ± 0.02B | 2.24 ± 0.02C | |
| Daily gain (g/d) | LP | 392.11 ± 25.02a | 500.56 ± 24.98b | 461.49 ± 22.52c |
| HP | 470.62 ± 23.68* A | 583.65 ± 31.87* B | 521.71 ± 29.14* C | |
| Gain:feed ratio | LP | 0.35 ± 0.01a | 0.28 ± 0.01ab | 0.20 ± 0.01b |
| HP | 0.42 ± 0.01* A | 0.34 ± 0.01* AB | 0.24 ± 0.01B |
1 Means ± SE without common letter differ significantly between body weight groups (lower case for LP group and upper case for HP).* indicating treatment differences at the same body weight (P < 0.05).
2LP, low protein diet.
3HP, high protein diet.
Effect of dietary protein on carcass composition1
| 30 kg | 60 kg | 100 kg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lean meat percentage(%) | LP | 47.73 ± 1.01a | 41.75 ± 0.77b | 37.90 ± 2.13c |
| HP | 48.65 ± 1.02A | 44.43 ± 2.13B | 40.65 ± 3.35C | |
| Fat meat percentage(%) | LP | 20.82 ± 1.68a | 34.10 ± 0.62b | 39.17 ± 2.04* c |
| HP | 18.68 ± 1.41A | 31.53 ± 1.66B | 36.00 ± 1.08C | |
| Lean eye area (cm2) | LP | 10.96 ± 0.12a | 17.69 ± 1.52b | 21.53 ± 1.66c |
| HP | 11.66 ± 1.24A | 20.02 ± 1.59B | 23.76 ± 1.22* C | |
| Average backfat thickness (cm) | LP | 1.80 ± 0.13a | 3.18 ± 0.20* a | 4.75 ± 0.16* a |
| HP | 1.73 ± 0.10A | 2.84 ± 0.26B | 3.55 ± 0.14C |
1 Symbols/abbreviations as for table 3.
Figure 1Effect of dietary protein on adipocyte size. Means ± SE without common letter differ significantly between body weight groups (lower case for LP group and upper case for HP) (P < 0.05). * indicates treatment differences at the same body weight (P < 0.05).
Effect of dietary protein on serum parameters1
| 30 kg | 60 kg | 100 kg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free fatty acids ( | LP | 238.42 ± 12.33a | 320.00 ± 17.11b | 240.23 ± 11.32c |
| HP | 253.82 ± 11.22A | 410.34 ± 16.22* B | 320.24 ± 12.42* C | |
| Triacylglycerol (mmol/L) | LP | 0.38 ± 0.03a | 0.47 ± 0.04ab | 0.51 ± 0.02b |
| HP | 0.40 ± 0.02A | 0.63 ± 0.07* AB | 0.75 ± 0.03* B | |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | LP | 64.62 ± 3.77a | 65.09 ± 2.11a | 66.22 ± 5.76a |
| HP | 64.73 ± 4.01A | 65.49 ± 1.76A | 66.42 ± 2.99A | |
| Insulin ( | LP | 6.76 ± 0.11a | 7.99 ± 0.10a | 7.52 ± 0.17a |
| HP | 6.63 ± 0.18A | 7.49 ± 0.11A | 7.22 ± 0.09A |
1 Symbols/abbreviations as for table 3
Effect of dietary protein level on adipose tissue enzyme activities1
| 30 kg | 60 kg | 100 kg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACC | LP | 28.35 ± 1.12a | 40.03 ± 2.00* ab | 47.43 ± 1.24* b |
| HP | 24.12 ± 1.90A | 26.04 ± 1.91AB | 34.13 ± 1.25B | |
| FAS | LP | 33.41 ± 1.32a | 69.03 ± 3.14* b | 72.23 ± 3.42* b |
| HP | 35.34 ± 1.09A | 54.04 ± 1.80B | 60.41 ± 2.20B | |
| ME | LP | 253.43 ± 14.23a | 290.33 ± 12.44* b | 320.34 ± 13.42* b |
| HP | 234.12 ± 12.09A | 240.43 ± 11.90A | 253.11 ± 13.20A | |
| G-6-PDH | LP | 189.42 ± 12.34a | 233.32 ± 17.43* b | 290.54 ± 14.67* c |
| HP | 177.23 ± 12.12A | 168.01 ± 18.65A | 278.39 ± 15.77B | |
| LPL | LP | 29.56 ± 1.45a | 30.43 ± 1.22a | 29.21 ± 1.88a |
| HP | 27.43 ± 1.34A | 40.11 ± 1.13* B | 36.43 ± 1.01* B | |
| HSL | LP | 3.62 ± 0.16a | 8.02 ± 0.08* b | 4.21 ± 0.06a |
| HP | 3.75 ± 0.13A | 6.43 ± 0.02B | 6.43 ± 0.06* B | |
| CPT-1 | LP | 2.17 ± 0.09a | 6.34 ± 0.11b | 5.94 ± 0.10b |
| HP | 2.13 ± 0.05A | 6.02 ± 0.09* B | 3.12 ± 0.06* A |
1 Symbols/abbreviations as for table 3.
Figure 2Relative mRNA abundance of lipogenic genes in adipose tissues at 30, 60 and 100 kg body weights of pigs fed high and low dietary protein, based on extraction of total RNA and subsequent real-time PCR analysis. Means ± SE without common letter differ significantly between body weight groups (lower case for LP group and upper case for HP). * indicates treatment differences at the same body weight (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Relative mRNA abundance of lipolysis genes in adipose tissues at 30, 60 and 100 kg body weights of pigs fed high and low dietary protein, based on extraction of total RNA and subsequent real-time PCR analysis. Means ± SE without common letter differ significantly between body weight groups (lower case for LP group and upper case for HP). * indicates treatment differences at the same body weight (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Protein expressions in adipose tissues at 30, 60 and 100 kg body weights of pigs fed high and low dietary protein. Means ± SE without common letter differ significantly between age groups (lower case for LP group and upper case for HP). * indicates treatment differences at the same body weight (P < 0.05).
Figure 5Impact of high dietary protein on lipid metabolism in porcine adipose tissue at body weight 60 kg. ↑: up-regulation of gene expression or increased concentration of metabolite. ↓: down-regulation of gene expression or enzyme activity or decreased concentration of metabolite. +: enhanced metabolic pathway; -: diminished metabolic pathway.
Figure 6Impact of high dietary protein on lipid metabolism in porcine adipose tissue at body weight 100 kg. ↑: up-regulation of gene expression or increased concentration of metabolites. ↓: down-regulation of gene expression or enzyme activity or decreased concentration of metabolite. +: enhanced metabolic pathway; -: diminished metabolic pathway. At body weight 30 kg, there were no differences except that gene expression of FAS was up-regulated.