Literature DB >> 20204949

The role of attitudes towards the targets of behaviour in predicting and informing prenatal testing choices.

Louise D Bryant1, Josephine M Green, Jenny Hewison.   

Abstract

Research considering the role of attitudes in prenatal testing choices has commonly focused on the relationship between the attitude towards undergoing testing and actual testing behaviour. In contrast, this study focused on the relationship between testing behaviour and attitudes towards the targets of the behaviour (in this case people with Down syndrome (DS) and having a baby with DS). A cross-sectional, prospective survey of 197 pregnant women measured attitudes towards the targets of prenatal testing along with intentions to use screening and diagnostic testing, and the termination of an affected pregnancy. Screening uptake was established via patient records. Although attitudes towards DS and having a baby with DS were significantly associated with screening uptake and testing and termination intentions, unfavourable attitudes were better than favourable ones at predicting these outcomes. For example, in the quartile of women with the 'most favourable' attitude towards people with DS 67% used screening although only 8% said they would terminate an affected pregnancy. Qualitative data suggested that not all women considered personal attitudes towards DS to be relevant to their screening decisions. This finding has implications for the way in which informed choice is currently understood and measured in the prenatal testing context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20204949     DOI: 10.1080/08870440903055893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health        ISSN: 0887-0446


  10 in total

1.  Extended family impact of genetic testing: the experiences of X-linked carrier grandmothers.

Authors:  Anna Lehmann; Beverley S Speight; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Talking Points: Women's Information Needs for Informed Decision-Making About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Aimée C Dane; Madelyn Peterson; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Epistemic Virtue, Prospective Parents and Disability Abortion.

Authors:  James B Gould
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Development of a fragile X syndrome (FXS) knowledge scale: towards a modified multidimensional measure of informed choice for FXS population carrier screening.

Authors:  Alice G Ames; Alice Jaques; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Alison D Archibald; Rony E Duncan; Jon Emery; Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening: An assessment of written materials.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; Stephanie A Kraft; Mollie A Minear; Roberta R Ryan; Megan A Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13

7.  What is so complicated about prenatal testing for Down syndrome? A personal view.

Authors:  Louise Bryant
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.881

8.  Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Melania Elena Pop-Tudose; Dana Popescu-Spineni; Petru Armean; Ioan Victor Pop
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  The limited effect of information on Israeli pregnant women at advanced maternal age who decide to undergo amniocentesis.

Authors:  Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Michal Berkenstet; Elon Pras
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2015-08-17

10.  Reasons for accepting or declining Down syndrome screening in Dutch prospective mothers within the context of national policy and healthcare system characteristics: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Neeltje M T H Crombag; Hennie Boeije; Rita Iedema-Kuiper; Peter C J I Schielen; Gerard H A Visser; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.