Literature DB >> 20204582

Species differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Pierre-Louis Toutain1, Aude Ferran, Alain Bousquet-Mélou.   

Abstract

Veterinary medicine faces the unique challenge of having to treat many types of domestic animal species, including mammals, birds, and fishes. Moreover, these species have evolved into genetically unique breeds having certain distinguishable characteristics developed by artificial selection. The main challenge for veterinarians is not to select a drug but to determine, for the selected agent, a rational dosing regimen because the dosage regimen for a drug in a given species may depend on its anatomy, biochemistry, physiology, and behaviour as well as on the nature and causes of the condition requiring treatment. Both between- and within-species differences in drug response can be explained either by variations in drug pharmacokinetics (PK) or drug pharmacodynamics (PD), the magnitude of which varies from drug to drug. This chapter highlights selected aspects of species differences in PK and PD and considers underlying physiological and patho-physiological mechanisms in the main domestic species. Particular attention was paid to aspects of animal behaviour (food behaviour, social behavior, etc.) as a determinant of interspecies differences in PK or/and PD. Modalities of drug administration are many and result not only from anatomical, physiological and/or behavioural differences across species but also from management options. The latter is the case for collective/group treatment of food-producing animals, frequently dosed by the oral route at a herd or flock level. After drug administration, the main causes of observed inter-species differences arise from species differences in the handling of drugs (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination). Such differences are most common and of greatest magnitude when functions which are phylogenetically divergent between species, such as digestive functions (ruminant vs. non-ruminant, carnivore vs. herbivore, etc.), are involved in drug absorption. Interspecies differences also exist in drug action but these are generally more limited, except when a particular targeted function has evolved, as is the case for reproductive physiology (mammals vs. birds vs. fishes; annual vs. seasonal reproductive cycle in mammals; etc.). In contrast, for antimicrobial and antiparasitic drugs, interspecies differences are more limited and rather reflect those of the pathogens than of the host. Interspecies difference in drug metabolism is a major factor accounting for species differences in PK and also in PD (production or not of active metabolites). Recent and future advances in molecular biology and pharmacogenetics will enable a more comprehensive view of interspecies differences and also between breeds with existing polymorphism. Finally, the main message of this review is that differences between species are not only numerous but also often unpredictable so that no generalisations are possible, even though for several drugs allometric approaches do allow some valuable interspecies extrapolations. Instead, each drug must be investigated on a species-by-species basis to guarantee its effective and safe use, thus ensuring the well-being of animals and safeguarding of the environment and human consumption of animal products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20204582     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10324-7_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol        ISSN: 0171-2004


  28 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial therapy of selected diseases in turkeys, laying hens, and minor poultry species in Canada.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; Carolee Carson; Dave Léger
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Allometric scaling of pegylated liposomal anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Whitney P Caron; Harvey Clewell; Robert Dedrick; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Whitney L Davis; Ning Yu; Margaret Tonda; Jan H Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; William C Zamboni
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  The Promise of Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapies: From Need to Manufacture.

Authors:  Howard E Gendelman; JoEllyn McMillan; Aditya N Bade; Benson Edagwa; Bhavesh D Kevadiya
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 17.079

4.  Pluripotent stem cell assays: Modalities and applications for predictive developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Aldert H Piersma; Nancy C Baker; George P Daston; Burkhard Flick; Michio Fujiwara; Thomas B Knudsen; Horst Spielmann; Noriyuki Suzuki; Katya Tsaioun; Hajime Kojima
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 5.  A Critical Review of the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety Data of Antibiotics in Avian Species.

Authors:  Hui Yun Soh; Prisca Xin Yi Tan; Tao Tao Magdeline Ng; Hui Ting Chng; Shangzhe Xie
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

6.  Influence of methylxanthines isolated from Bancha green tea on the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil in rats.

Authors:  Maya Radeva-Llieva; Stanila Stoeva; Nadezhda Hvarchanova; Iliya Zhelev; Kaloyan D Georgiev
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.088

7.  Characterization of Pharmacokinetics in the Göttingen Minipig with Reference Human Drugs: An In Vitro and In Vivo Approach.

Authors:  Floriane Lignet; Eva Sherbetjian; Nicole Kratochwil; Russell Jones; Claudia Suenderhauf; Michael B Otteneder; Thomas Singer; Neil Parrott
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Activity of Antibiotics against Mycobacterium Species Commonly Found in Laboratory Zebrafish.

Authors:  Carolyn T Chang; Christopher M Whipps
Journal:  J Aquat Anim Health       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.625

9.  Dose imprecision and resistance: free-choice medicated feeds in industrial food animal production in the United States.

Authors:  David C Love; Meghan F Davis; Anna Bassett; Andrew Gunther; Keeve E Nachman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A comparative analysis on the binding characteristics of various mammalian albumins towards a multitherapeutic agent, pinostrobin.

Authors:  Shevin R Feroz; Rumana A Sumi; Sri N A Malek; Saad Tayyab
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2014-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.