Literature DB >> 20204410

Spatial variation in abiotic and biotic factors in a floodplain determine anuran body size and growth rate at metamorphosis.

Lukas Indermaur1, Benedikt R Schmidt, Klement Tockner, Michael Schaub.   

Abstract

Body size at metamorphosis is a critical trait in the life history of amphibians. Despite the wide-spread use of amphibians as experimental model organisms, there is a limited understanding of how multiple abiotic and biotic factors affect the variation in metamorphic traits under natural conditions. The aim of our study was to quantify the effects of abiotic and biotic factors on spatial variation in the body size of tadpoles and size at metamorphosis of the European common toad (Bufo b. spinosus). Our study population was distributed over the riverbed (active tract) and the fringing riparian forest of a natural floodplain. The riverbed had warm ponds with variable hydroperiod and few predators, whereas the forest had ponds with the opposite characteristics. Spatial variation in body size at metamorphosis was governed by the interactive effects of abiotic and biotic factors. The particular form of the interaction between water temperature and intraspecific tadpole density suggests that abiotic factors laid the foundation for biotic factors: intraspecific density decreased growth only at high temperature. Predation and intraspecific density jointly reduced metamorphic size. Interspecific density had a negligible affect on body size at metamorphosis, suggesting weak inter-anuran interactions in the larval stage. Population density at metamorphosis was about one to two orders of magnitudes higher in the riverbed ponds than in the forest ponds, mainly because of lower tadpole mortality. Based on our results, we conclude that ponds in the riverbed appear to play a pivotal role for the population because tadpole growth and survival is best in this habitat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20204410     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1586-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs.

Authors:  Res Altwegg; Heinz-Ulrich Reyer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Effects of body size and temperature on population growth.

Authors:  Van M Savage; James F Gilloly; James H Brown; Eric L Charnov
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  The role of local populations within a landscape context: defining and classifying sources and sinks.

Authors:  Jonathan P Runge; Michael C Runge; James D Nichols
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Species abundance distributions result from body size-energetics relationships.

Authors:  Craig Loehle
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Temperature, growth rate, and body size in ectotherms: fitting pieces of a life-history puzzle.

Authors:  Michael J Angilletta; Todd D Steury; Michael W Sears
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Size and temperature in the evolution of fish life histories.

Authors:  Eric L Charnov; James F Gillooly
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  Plasticity of insect reproduction: testing models of flexible and fixed development in response to different growth rates.

Authors:  Gregory S Moehrlin; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Impacts of climate and density on the duration of the tadpole stage of the common toad Bufo bufo.

Authors:  C J Reading; R T Clarke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Latitudinal countergradient variation in the common frog (Rana temporaria) development rates--evidence for local adaptation.

Authors:  A T Laugen; A Laurila; K Räsänen; J Merilä
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Exposure, postexposure, and density-mediated effects of atrazine on amphibians: breaking down net effects into their parts.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Tyler Sager; Timothy M Sesterhenn; Brent D Palmer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

1.  Simulated developmental and reproductive impacts on amphibian populations and implications for assessing long-term effects.

Authors:  Jill A Awkerman; Sandy Raimondo
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Variation in phenology and density differentially affects predator-prey interactions between salamanders.

Authors:  Thomas L Anderson; Freya E Rowland; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Social familiarity modulates group living and foraging behaviour of juvenile predatory mites.

Authors:  Markus A Strodl; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-03-15

4.  Larger body size at metamorphosis enhances survival, growth and performance of young cane toads (Rhinella marina).

Authors:  Elisa Cabrera-Guzmán; Michael R Crossland; Gregory P Brown; Richard Shine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of Transgenic cry1Ca Rice on the Development of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Xiuping Chen; Jiamei Wang; Haojun Zhu; Yunhe Li; Jiatong Ding; Yufa Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Influence of damming on anuran species richness in riparian areas: A test of the serial discontinuity concept.

Authors:  Jacquelyn C Guzy; Evan A Eskew; Brian J Halstead; Steven J Price
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Is the behavioural divergence between range-core and range-edge populations of cane toads (Rhinella marina) due to evolutionary change or developmental plasticity?

Authors:  Jodie Gruber; Gregory Brown; Martin J Whiting; Richard Shine
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.963

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.