Literature DB >> 20204060

Changes in the gonial angle following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy for mandibular excess.

Javad Yazdani1, Kourosh Taheri Talesh, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Ali Ghavimi.   

Abstract

AIM: The gonial angle plays an important role in ensuring a harmonious facial profile. Changes in this angle after surgery may be an esthetic concern for both the patient and the surgeon. The aim of the present study was to evaluate gonial angle changes after mandibular setback by the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and vertical ramus osteotomy (VRO) techniques.
METHODS: Fifty-eight male patients with mandibular prognathism only were treated from 2004 to 2006 (deformities such as discrepancy of jaws, mandibular setback of more than 10 mm, asymmetry, and vertical discrepancy were excluded). Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. In the first group, mandibular setback was performed using the Obwegeser technique and wire osteosynthesis with 4 weeks' fixation (IMF), and in the second group, mandibular setback via VRO without wire osteosynthesis and 4 weeks' IMF was carried out. Lateral cephalograms were obtained for all the patients before surgery (T(0)) and 1 year after surgery (T(1)). Gonial angle and occlusal plane-SN in T(0) and T(1) were evaluated.
RESULTS: After surgery, the gonial angle had decreased in all patients. Decrease in the gonial angle in the VRO group was greater than the BSSO group. The average decrease in the gonial angle was significantly more (P < 0.05) in the VRO group (7 degrees) than in the BSSO group (2 degrees).
CONCLUSION: Gonial angle decrease was observed in the present study following mandibular setback by the VRO and BSSO techniques. This decrease in the VRO group was significantly greater.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20204060      PMCID: PMC2829198     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eplasty        ISSN: 1937-5719


  10 in total

1.  Variations of the gonial angle in vertical surgical reduction of the maxillary-mandibular complex.

Authors:  Rinna Claudio; Ungari Claudio; Agrillo Alessandro; Tedaldi Massimiliano; Moles Angelo
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  A contra-angle saw blade for intraoral vertical osteotomy.

Authors:  M H Motamedi
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1998-05

3.  Transient temporal nerve paresis after intraoral subcondylar ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  M H Motamedi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  A comparison between superior and inferior border wiring techniques in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  R S Singer; R A Bays
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Skeletofacial changes by mandibular advancement using sagittal split osteotomies.

Authors:  M A Gomes; P J Wisth; K Tornes; O E Bøe
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1993

6.  Relationships between the orientation and moment arms of the human jaw muscles and normal craniofacial morphology.

Authors:  P H van Spronsen; J H Koolstra; F C van Ginkel; W A Weijs; J Valk; B Prahl-Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Treatment of condylar hyperplasia of the mandible using unilateral ramus osteotomies.

Authors:  M H Motamedi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Ellen Wen-Ching Ko; Chiung Shing Huang; Yu Ray Chen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Hyoid position, pharyngeal airway and head posture in relation to relapse after the mandibular setback in skeletal Class III.

Authors:  G Gu; G Gu; J Nagata; M Suto; Y Anraku; K Nakamura; K Kuroe; G Ito
Journal:  Clin Orthod Res       Date:  2000-05

10.  Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback.

Authors:  Izumi Yoshioka; Amit Khanal; Kazuhiro Tominaga; Akihisa Horie; Norihiko Furuta; Jinichi Fukuda
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.895

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of Relapse Following Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Mandibular Setback and Short-term Immobilization.

Authors:  Koroush Taheri Talesh; Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi; Mahdi Sazavar; Javad Yazdani
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-07-19

2.  Three-dimensional analysis of mandible ramus morphology and transverse stability after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Luo Huang; Shan Tang; Jing Yan; Yaoran Liu; Zhengguo Piao
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.