Literature DB >> 20203523

Yin yang haplotypes revisited - long, disparate haplotypes observed in European populations in regions of increased homozygosity.

David Curtis1, Anna E Vine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Yin yang haplotypes differ at every SNP. A previous study provided striking examples of these haplotypes, but claimed that their distribution across the genome could be attributed to chance. When we studied regions of homozygosity (ROHs) we found haplotypes that tended to differ at several SNPs simultaneously but did not subject this to formal testing. Here, we formally assess whether haplotypes from these regions provide evidence for the yin yang effect.
METHOD: We identified 20 regions where ROHs are common in a sample of European subjects and studied the most frequent haplotypes of SNPs with high minor allele frequency. We calculated the average 'disparity' between all haplotype pairs using a 'disparity score' calculated as 2(d), where d is the number of SNPs at which a pair of haplotypes differ. We also studied these SNPs in HapMap samples.
RESULTS: Overall, there was highly significant evidence for excess haplotype disparity. Three of the HapMap populations with European ancestry also had statistically significant haplotype disparity scores.
CONCLUSION: Locations where ROHs are frequent harbour long common haplotypes showing surprising disparity. We believe these haplotypes must represent ancient founder effects and could be valuable for elucidating features of a population's history. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20203523     DOI: 10.1159/000289592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  8 in total

1.  Rare missense variants within a single gene form yin yang haplotypes.

Authors:  David Curtis
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Haplotype-based study of the association of alcohol-metabolizing genes with alcohol dependence in four independent populations.

Authors:  Jixia Liu; Zhifeng Zhou; Colin A Hodgkinson; Qiaoping Yuan; Pei-Hong Shen; Connie J Mulligan; Alex Wang; Rebecca R Gray; Alec Roy; Matti Virkkunen; David Goldman; Mary-Anne Enoch
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Human gephyrin is encompassed within giant functional noncoding yin-yang sequences.

Authors:  Sharlee Climer; Alan R Templeton; Weixiong Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Determining the genome-wide kinship coefficient seems unhelpful in distinguishing consanguineous couples with a high versus low risk for adverse reproductive outcome.

Authors:  W Kelmemi; M E Teeuw; Z Bochdanovits; S Ouburg; M A Jonker; F Alkuraya; M Hashem; H Kayserili; A van Haeringen; E Sheridan; A Masri; J M Cobben; P Rizzu; P J Kostense; C J Dommering; L Henneman; H Bouhamed-Chaabouni; P Heutink; L P Ten Kate; M C Cornel
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.103

5.  Intricacies in arrangement of SNP haplotypes suggest "Great Admixture" that created modern humans.

Authors:  Rajib Dutta; Joseph Mainsah; Yuriy Yatskiv; Sharmistha Chakrabortty; Patrick Brennan; Basil Khuder; Shuhao Qiu; Larisa Fedorova; Alexei Fedorov
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Analysis of Brugada syndrome loci reveals that fine-mapping clustered GWAS hits enhances the annotation of disease-relevant variants.

Authors:  Mel Lina Pinsach-Abuin; Bernat Del Olmo; Adrian Pérez-Agustin; Jesus Mates; Catarina Allegue; Anna Iglesias; Qi Ma; Daria Merkurjev; Sergiy Konovalov; Jing Zhang; Farah Sheikh; Amalio Telenti; Josep Brugada; Ramon Brugada; Melissa Gymrek; Julia di Iulio; Ivan Garcia-Bassets; Sara Pagans
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-04-20

7.  Unexpected relationships and inbreeding in HapMap phase III populations.

Authors:  Eric L Stevens; Joseph D Baugher; Matthew D Shirley; Laurence P Frelin; Jonathan Pevsner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quinoa genome assembly employing genomic variation for guided scaffolding.

Authors:  Alexandrina Bodrug-Schepers; Nancy Stralis-Pavese; Hermann Buerstmayr; Juliane C Dohm; Heinz Himmelbauer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 5.699

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.