Literature DB >> 20203216

Comparison of the performance of direct fluorescent antibody staining, a point-of-care rapid antigen test and virus isolation with that of RT-PCR for the detection of novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus in respiratory specimens.

Tina Ganzenmueller1, Jeanette Kluba1, Birgit Hilfrich1, Wolfram Puppe1, Willem Verhagen1, Albert Heim1, Thomas Schulz1, Cornelia Henke-Gendo1.   

Abstract

Although infections with the novel pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus (A/H1N1/2009) appeared to be relatively mild during the first summer of circulation ('off season'), there has been significant morbidity and hospitalization and several fatal cases. Thus, rapid detection of A/H1N1/2009 is crucial for efficient treatment and infection control measures. In contrast to seasonal influenza, where point-of-care (POC) rapid antigen tests and direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) staining ensure rapid detection, diagnosis of A/H1N1/2009 has so far been based on RT-PCR. This study retrospectively compared the performance of the Quidel QuickVue POC test, DFA staining and virus isolation with that of RT-PCR for A/H1N1/2009 detection in 526 respiratory specimens collected during the first wave of the outbreak from May to September 2009. A/H1N1/2009 was detected in 9.1% (48/526) of samples. One hundred and thirty-seven of the A/H1N1/2009 PCR-negative samples were additionally tested using a RealAccurate Respiratory RT-PCR panel, revealing other respiratory viruses (mainly entero/rhino- and adenoviruses) in 42.3% (58/137). All methods analysed detected A/H1N1/2009 with excellent specificity but different sensitivities (POC test: 18.2%; DFA staining: 38.7%; virus isolation: 45.7%). Therefore, the POC test was not suitable for diagnosis, detecting A/H1N1/2009 only if present in high concentrations (corresponding median Ct value=19.0; range=16.5-21.4). DFA staining was also able to detect A/H1N1/2009 in specimens with a lower virus concentration (median Ct value=24.0; range=16.5-29.8). Virus isolation, which was positive after a median time of 7.5 days, was too time-consuming. In summary, DFA staining is superior to POC testing and may be appropriate for patients expected to have a rather high level of virus replication. Nevertheless, in DFA-negative specimens, A/H1N1/2009 should be excluded by RT-PCR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20203216     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.017244-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  23 in total

1.  rapidSTRIPE H1N1 test for detection of the pandemic swine origin influenza A (H1N1) virus.

Authors:  Pranav Patel; Elmara Graser; Stephan Robst; Roger Hillert; Axel Meye; Timo Hillebrand; Matthias Niedrig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Direct fluorescent-antibody testing followed by culture for diagnosis of 2009 H1N1 influenza A.

Authors:  Paul Bakerman; Lilanthi Balasuriya; Ora Fried; David Tellez; Pamela Garcia-Filion; Heidi Dalton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Development of two types of rapid diagnostic test kits to detect the hemagglutinin or nucleoprotein of the swine-origin pandemic influenza A virus H1N1.

Authors:  Rika Mizuike; Tadahiro Sasaki; Koichi Baba; Hisahiko Iwamoto; Yusuke Shibai; Mieko Kosaka; Ritsuko Kubota-Koketsu; Cheng-Song Yang; Anariwa Du; Akikazu Sakudo; Muneo Tsujikawa; Mikihiro Yunoki; Kazuyoshi Ikuta
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-01-12

4.  Detection of Cryptosporidium molnari oocysts from fish by fluorescent-antibody staining assays for cryptosporidium spp. affecting humans.

Authors:  Rona Barugahare; Michelle M Dennis; Joy A Becker; Jan Slapeta
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Two years after pandemic influenza A/2009/H1N1: what have we learned?

Authors:  Vincent C C Cheng; Kelvin K W To; Herman Tse; Ivan F N Hung; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Comparison of four multiplex PCR assays for the detection of viral pathogens in respiratory specimens.

Authors:  Trevor P Anderson; Anja M Werno; Kevin Barratt; Patalee Mahagamasekera; David R Murdoch; Lance C Jennings
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.014

7.  Are Rapid Influenza Antigen Tests Still Clinically Useful in Today's Molecular Diagnostics World?

Authors:  Valentina K Trombetta; Yvonne L Chan; Matthew J Bankowski
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2018-09

Review 8.  Tools to detect influenza virus.

Authors:  Dae-Ki Kim; Barun Poudel
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  A distinct influenza infection signature in the blood transcriptome of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Grant P Parnell; Anthony S McLean; David R Booth; Nicola J Armstrong; Marek Nalos; Stephen J Huang; Jan Manak; Wilson Tang; Oi-Yan Tam; Stanley Chan; Benjamin M Tang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Advances in diagnosis of respiratory virus infections.

Authors:  Michael Loeffelholz; Tasnee Chonmaitree
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.