Literature DB >> 20202834

Optimizing on-farm pretreatment of perennial grasses for fuel ethanol production.

Matthew F Digman1, Kevin J Shinners, Michael D Casler, Bruce S Dien, Ronald D Hatfield, Hans-Joachim G Jung, Richard E Muck, Paul J Weimer.   

Abstract

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) were pretreated under ambient temperature and pressure with sulfuric acid and calcium hydroxide in separate experiments. Chemical loadings from 0 to 100g (kg DM)(-1) and durations of anaerobic storage from 0 to 180days were investigated by way of a central composite design at two moisture contents (40% or 60% w.b.). Pretreated and untreated samples were fermented to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae D5A in the presence of a commercially available cellulase (Celluclast 1.5L) and beta-glucosidase (Novozyme 188). Xylose levels were also measured following fermentation because xylose is not metabolized by S. cerevisiae. After sulfuric acid pretreatment and anaerobic storage, conversion of cell wall glucose to ethanol for reed canarygrass ranged from 22% to 83% whereas switchgrass conversions ranged from 16% to 46%. Pretreatment duration had a positive effect on conversion but was mitigated with increased chemical loadings. Conversions after calcium hydroxide pretreatment and anaerobic storage ranged from 21% to 55% and 18% to 54% for reed canarygrass and switchgrass, respectively. The efficacy of lime pretreatment was found to be highly dependent on moisture content. Moreover, pretreatment duration was only found to be significant for reed canarygrass. Although significant levels of acetate and lactate were observed in the biomass after storage, S. cerevisiae was not found to be inhibited at a 10% solids loading. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20202834     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biotechnological advances in biomass pretreatment for bio-renewable production through nanotechnological intervention.

Authors:  Heena Chandel; Prateek Kumar; Anuj K Chandel; Madan L Verma
Journal:  Biomass Convers Biorefin       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.050

2.  Chemical and physicochemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: a review.

Authors:  Gary Brodeur; Elizabeth Yau; Kimberly Badal; John Collier; K B Ramachandran; Subramanian Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Enzyme Res       Date:  2011-05-24

3.  Evaluation of preservation methods for improving biogas production and enzymatic conversion yields of annual crops.

Authors:  Annukka Pakarinen; Pekka Maijala; Seija Jaakkola; Frederick L Stoddard; Maritta Kymäläinen; Liisa Viikari
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  Ensiling and hydrothermal pretreatment of grass: consequences for enzymatic biomass conversion and total monosaccharide yields.

Authors:  Morten Ambye-Jensen; Katja S Johansen; Thomas Didion; Zsófia Kádár; Anne S Meyer
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 5.  Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: a review.

Authors:  Adepu Kiran Kumar; Shaishav Sharma
Journal:  Bioresour Bioprocess       Date:  2017-01-18

6.  Silage quality and biogas production from Spartina pectinata L. fermented with a novel xylan-degrading strain of Lactobacillus buchneri M B/00077.

Authors:  Marta Kupryś-Caruk; Renata Choińska; Agnieszka Dekowska; Katarzyna Piasecka-Jóźwiak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Ensiling of wheat straw decreases the required temperature in hydrothermal pretreatment.

Authors:  Morten Ambye-Jensen; Sune Tjalfe Thomsen; Zsófia Kádár; Anne S Meyer
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.040

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.