Literature DB >> 20202815

Dose sparing of brainstem and spinal cord for re-irradiating recurrent head and neck cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Chin-Cheng Chen1, Chen-Chiao Lee, Dennis Mah, Rajiv Sharma, Evan Landau, Madhur Garg, Andrew Wu.   

Abstract

Because of the dose limit for critical structures such as brainstem and spinal cord, administering a dose of 60 Gy to patients with recurrent head and neck cancer is challenging for those who received a previous dose of 60-70 Gy. Specifically, previously irradiated head and neck patients may have received doses close to the tolerance limit to their brainstem and spinal cord. In this study, a reproducible intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment design is presented to spare the doses to brainstem and spinal cord, with no compromise of prescribed dose delivery. Between July and November 2008, 7 patients with previously irradiated, recurrent head and neck cancers were treated with IMRT. The jaws of each field were set fixed with the goal of shielding the brainstem and spinal cord at the sacrifice of partial coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) from any particular beam orientation. Beam geometry was arranged to have sufficient coverage of the PTV and ensure that the constraints of spinal cord <10 Gy and brainstem <15 Gy were met. The mean maximum dose to the brainstem was 12.1 Gy (range 6.1-17.3 Gy), and the corresponding mean maximum dose to spinal cord was 10.4 Gy (range 8.2-14.1 Gy). For most cases, 97% of the PTV volume was fully covered by the 95% isodose volume. We found empirically that if the angle of cervical spine curvature (Cobb's angle) was less than ∼30°, patients could be treated by 18 fields. Six patients met these criteria and were treated in 25 minutes per fraction. One patient exceeded a 30° Cobb's angle and was treated by 31 fields in 45 minutes per fraction. We have demonstrated a new technique for retreatment of head and neck cancers. The angle of cervical spine curvature plays an important role in the efficiency and effectiveness of our approach.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20202815     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2009.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  3 in total

1.  Dosimetric analysis of isocentrically shielded volumetric modulated arc therapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Bao-Tian Huang; Lei Xing; Daniel T Chang; Xun Peng; Liang-Xi Xie; Zhi-Xiong Lin; Mei Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Preventive sparing of spinal cord and brain stem in the initial irradiation of locally advanced head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Paolo Farace; Sara Piras; Sergio Porru; Federica Massazza; Giuseppina Fadda; Ignazio Solla; Denise Piras; Maria Assunta Deidda; Maurizio Amichetti; Marco Possanzini
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Accuracy quantification of a deformable image registration tool applied in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Christoph Hoffmann; Sonja Krause; Eva M Stoiber; Angela Mohr; Stefan Rieken; Oliver Schramm; Jürgen Debus; Florian Sterzing; Rolf Bendl; Kristina Giske
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.