Literature DB >> 20202728

Hemoglobin A(1c) and fructosamine for assessing glycemic control in diabetic patients with CKD stages 3 and 4.

Harn-Shen Chen1, Tzu-En Wu, Hong-Da Lin, Tjin-Shing Jap, Li-Chuan Hsiao, Shen-Hung Lee, Shu-Hsia Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) and fructosamine can be used to monitor glycemic control in diabetic patients with normal kidney function, but their validity in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the correlation and accuracy of these 2 measures of glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with CKD stages 3-4. STUDY
DESIGN: Diagnostic test study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Type 2 diabetic patients with normal (n = 30) and abnormal kidney function (n = 30) were recruited in Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. INDEX TESTS: HbA(1c) and fructosamine. REFERENCE TEST: Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels. MEASUREMENTS: Blood glucose measurements consisted of 6 preprandial, 6 postprandial, and 2 bedtime assessments in a week with a cycle of 4-week intervals for 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between HbA(1c) level or fructosamine-albumin ratio and mean blood glucose levels were 0.836 and 0.645 in participants with normal kidney function and 0.813 and 0.649 in participants with CKD stages 3-4, respectively. In patients with CKD stages 3-4, mean blood glucose levels in weeks 1-12 were 21.9 mg/dL (95% CI, 11.6-32.5) higher than estimated average glucose (eAG) levels calculated from HbA(1c) levels in participants with normal kidney function. In patients with CKD stages 3-4, mean blood glucose levels in weeks 10-12 were 15.5 mg/dL (95% CI, 5.2-30.5) higher than eAG levels calculated from fructosamine levels in participants with normal kidney function, but without statistical significance when eAG calculated from fructosamine level was corrected for serum albumin level (difference of 5.6 mg/dL; 95% CI, -8.6 to 19.8). LIMITATIONS: Relatively small number of participants with limited amount of blood glucose measurement data.
CONCLUSION: Our data show that eAG calculated from HbA(1c) and fructosamine levels might underestimate mean blood glucose levels in patients with CKD stages 3-4. References ranges may need to be modified when interpreting results of measurements of glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with CKD. Copyright 2010 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20202728     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.10.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  17 in total

Review 1.  Managing Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.

Authors:  Dragana Lovre; Sulay Shah; Aanu Sihota; Vivian A Fonseca
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 2.  Pitfalls in hemoglobin A1c measurement: when results may be misleading.

Authors:  Michael S Radin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Therapeutic Considerations for Antihyperglycemic Agents in Diabetic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Joshua J Neumiller; Radica Z Alicic; Katherine R Tuttle
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  Advantages and pitfalls of fructosamine and glycated albumin in the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes.

Authors:  Elisa Danese; Martina Montagnana; Antonio Nouvenne; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 5.  Current therapeutic approaches in the management of hyperglycemia in chronic renal disease.

Authors:  Vishnu Garla; Licy Yanes-Cardozo; Lillian F Lien
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  A1C between 5.7 and 6.4% as a marker for identifying pre-diabetes, insulin sensitivity and secretion, and cardiovascular risk factors: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS).

Authors:  Carlos Lorenzo; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Anthony J G Hanley; Marian J Rewers; Andrew J Karter; Steven M Haffner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 7.  Beyond HbA1c and glucose: the role of nontraditional glycemic markers in diabetes diagnosis, prognosis, and management.

Authors:  Christina M Parrinello; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  Performance of non-traditional hyperglycemia biomarkers by chronic kidney disease status in older adults with diabetes: Results from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Molly Jung; Bethany Warren; Morgan Grams; Yuenting D Kwong; Tariq Shafi; Josef Coresh; Casey M Rebholz; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.006

9.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Use of Alternative Markers To Assess Glycemia in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Leila R Zelnick; Zona O Batacchi; Iram Ahmad; Ashveena Dighe; Randie R Little; Dace L Trence; Irl B Hirsch; Ian H de Boer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Dysglycemia but not lipids is associated with abnormal urinary albumin excretion in diabetic kidney disease: a report from the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP).

Authors:  Subhasish Bose; Andrew S Bomback; Nehal N Mehta; Shu-Cheng Chen; Suying Li; Adam Whaley-Connell; Joseph Benjamin; Peter A McCullough
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.