Literature DB >> 20202539

Intraocular lens exchange in patients with negative dysphotopsia symptoms.

Péter Vámosi1, Béla Csákány, János Németh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: to evaluate the results of intraocular lens (IOL) exchange in cases of severe negative dysphotopsia and to measure the distance between the iris and the IOL optic using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM).
SETTING: Szent Rókus Hospital and Eye Clinic, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
METHODS: Data of patients with major negative dysphotopsia symptoms after phacoemulsification with IOL implantation were reviewed retrospectively. In cases in which IOL exchange was performed to diminish the symptoms, the distance between the iris and the anterior surface of the IOL optic was measured by UBM and compared with that in a group of nonsymptomatic pseudophakic patients (control group).
RESULTS: in 3806 cataract procedures, 5 eyes (4 patients) had severe negative dysphotopsia symptoms. Intraocular lens exchange was performed in 3 cases. In 1 case, the secondary IOL was implanted in the reopened capsular bag and the symptoms persisted. In 2 cases, the secondary IOL was implanted in the ciliary sulcus and the symptoms resolved. On UBM, the mean iris-optic distance was 0.45 mm +/- 0.07 (SD) in the symptomatic group, 0.59 +/- 0.29 mm in the control group (n = 21) (P = .353), and 0.00 mm in the sulcus-fixated group.
CONCLUSIONS: The iris-optic distance was not statistically significantly different between eyes with severe negative dysphotopsia symptoms and nonsymptomatic eyes. However, when IOL exchange reduced the iris-IOL distance, the severe negative dysphotopsia symptoms resolved. Copyright 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20202539     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

1.  Determinants of patient satisfaction and function related to vision following cataract surgery in eyes with no visually consequential ocular co-morbidity.

Authors:  Clare Kirwan; John M Nolan; Jim Stack; Tara C B Moore; Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Treatment of negative dysphotopsia with supplementary implantation of a sulcus-fixated intraocular lens.

Authors:  Natalia Y Makhotkina; Tos T J M Berendschot; Henny J M Beckers; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Is the Memory Effect of the Blind Spot Involved in Negative Dysphotopsia after Cataract Surgery?

Authors:  Martin Wenzel; Rupert Menapace; Timo Eppig; Achim Langenbucher
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Distinct differences in anterior chamber configuration and peripheral aberrations in negative dysphotopsia.

Authors:  Luc van Vught; Gregorius P M Luyten; Jan-Willem M Beenakker
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Intensity simulation of photic effects after cataract surgery for off-axis light sources.

Authors:  Pooria Omidi; Alan Cayless; Achim Langenbucher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Clinical experience with an anti-dysphotopic intraocular lens.

Authors:  Zsófia Rupnik; Ágnes Elekes; Péter Vámosi
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-29

7.  Simulation of photic effects after cataract surgery for off-axis light sources.

Authors:  Pooria Omidi; Alan Cayless; Achim Langenbucher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.