Literature DB >> 20202349

The REFLECT statement: reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials in livestock and food safety: explanation and elaboration.

J M Sargeant1, A M O'Connor, I A Gardner, J S Dickson, M E Torrence, I R Dohoo, S L Lefebvre, P S Morley, A Ramirez, K Snedeker.   

Abstract

Concerns about the completeness and accuracy of reporting of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the impact of poor reporting on decision-making have been documented in the medical field over the past several decades. Experience from RCTs in human medicine would suggest that failure to report critical trial features can be associated with biased estimated effect measures, and there is evidence to suggest similar biases occur in RCTs conducted in livestock populations. In response to these concerns, standardized guidelines for reporting RCTs were developed and implemented in human medicine. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was first published in 1996 with a revised edition published in 2001. The CONSORT statement consists of a 22-item checklist for reporting a RCT and a flow diagram to follow the number of participants at each stage of a trial. An explanation and elaboration document not only defines and discusses the importance of each of the items, but also provides examples of how this information could be supplied in a publication. Differences between human and livestock populations necessitate modifications to the CONSORT statement to maximize its usefulness for RCTs involving livestock. These have been addressed in an extension of the CONSORT statement titled the REFLECT statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized control trials for livestock and food safety. The modifications made for livestock trials specifically addressed the common use of group housing and group allocation to intervention in livestock studies, the use of a deliberate challenge model in some trials, and common use of non-clinical outcomes, such as contamination with a foodborne pathogen. In addition, the REFLECT statement for RCTs in livestock populations proposed specific terms or further clarified terms as they pertained to livestock studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20202349     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.3.579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  11 in total

1.  Economic assessments from experimental research trials of feedlot cattle health and performance: a scoping review.

Authors:  Andrea L Dixon; Christy J Hanthorn; Dustin L Pendell; Natalia Cernicchiaro; David G Renter
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 2.  Describing and Characterizing the Literature Regarding Umbilical Health in Intensively Raised Cattle: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Matthew B Van Camp; David L Renaud; Todd F Duffield; Diego E Gomez; William J McFarlane; Joanne Marshall; Charlotte B Winder
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-11

3.  A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal Editors-in-Chief on reporting guidelines for publication of research.

Authors:  Douglas Jc Grindlay; Rachel S Dean; Mary M Christopher; Marnie L Brennan
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine.

Authors:  K J Wareham; R M Hyde; D Grindlay; M L Brennan; R S Dean
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Clinical Trials in Veterinary Medicine: A New Era Brings New Challenges.

Authors:  M A Oyama; S S Ellenberg; P A Shaw
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis.

Authors:  Rodolfo Santos Rossi; Ariadne Ferreira Amarante; Simony Trevisan Guerra; Giulia Soares Latosinski; Bruna Fernanda Rossi; Vera Lucia Mores Rall; Jose Carlos de Figueiredo Pantoja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A method of back-calculating the log odds ratio and standard error of the log odds ratio from the reported group-level risk of disease.

Authors:  Dapeng Hu; Chong Wang; Annette M O'Connor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Defining the Effect of Oxytocin Use in Farrowing Sows on Stillbirth Rate: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah V Hill; Maria Del Rocio Amezcua; Eduardo S Ribeiro; Terri L O'Sullivan; Robert M Friendship
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.231

9.  Sample size and number of outcome measures of veterinary randomised controlled trials of pharmaceutical interventions funded by different sources, a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  K J Wareham; R M Hyde; D Grindlay; M L Brennan; R S Dean
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Milk Somatic Cell Count and Polymorphonuclear Cells in Healthy Quarters of Cows That Underwent Blanket and Selective Dry Therapy: An Italian Case Study.

Authors:  Angela Costa; Massimo De Marchi; Daniele Sagrafoli; Hillary Lanzi; Simonetta Amatiste; Carlo Boselli; Giuseppina Giacinti
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.