Literature DB >> 20201743

Positive predictive value of serological diagnostic measures in celiac disease.

Peter Toftedal1, Christian Nielsen, Jonas Trolle Madsen, Kjell Titlestad, Steffen Husby, Søren Thue Lillevang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Celiac disease (CD) antibodies, immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG), IgA endomysium antibody (EMA), IgA and IgG anti-gliadin antibodies (IgA and IgG AGA) are first-line diagnostic tools used in selecting patients for duodenal biopsy. The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic quality of serological testing for CD.
METHODS: CD serological tests (IgA and IgG AGA, anti-tTG and EMA) from 11,915 individuals were measured. Data were combined with clinical data and results of duodenal biopsy using a unique Danish personal identification number.
RESULTS: The positive predictive value (PPV) varied according to different combinations of positive CD antibodies, being highest when all antibodies were positive (97.6%). The anti-tTG concentration correlated strongly with EMA positivity, number of additional positive antibodies, and higher PPV. A logistic regression model predicted the probability of later biopsy-proven CD in relation to concentrations of IgA AGA and anti-tTG at initial serological screening.
CONCLUSIONS: The anti-tTG concentration at initial serological CD screening was highly informative in relation to EMA positivity, number of additional CD specific antibodies and PPV. Furthermore, in the high-risk group of patients investigated, the concentrations of anti-tTG and IgA AGA at initial serological screening could accurately predict the probability of future biopsy-proven CD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20201743     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Screening for celiac disease in average-risk and high-risk populations.

Authors:  Saurabh Aggarwal; Benjamin Lebwohl; Peter H R Green
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 2.  Positive tissue transglutaminase antibodies with negative endomysial antibodies: coeliac disease or not?

Authors:  Thomas Hornung; Pavel Gordins; Clare Parker; Nicholas Thompson
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-13

3.  Prevalence and Clinical Features of Celiac Disease in Healthy School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Omer Faruk Beser; Emine Gulluelli; Fugen Cullu Cokugras; Tulay Erkan; Tufan Kutlu; Rasit Vural Yagci; Firuze Erbek Alp; Gulten Ercal; Nuray Kepil; Mine Kucur
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Using patients like my patient for clinical decision support: institution-specific probability of celiac disease diagnosis using simplified near-neighbor classification.

Authors:  Brian H Shirts; Sterling T Bennett; Brian R Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Fracture risk assessment in celiac disease: a registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  D R Duerksen; L M Lix; H Johansson; E V McCloskey; N C Harvey; J A Kanis; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The characterization of the repertoire of wheat antigens and peptides involved in the humoral immune responses in patients with gluten sensitivity and Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Aristo Vojdani
Journal:  ISRN Allergy       Date:  2011-10-27

7.  Estimating the Impact of Verification Bias on Celiac Disease Testing.

Authors:  Isabel A Hujoel; Claire L Jansson-Knodell; Philippe P Hujoel; Margaux L A Hujoel; Rok Seon Choung; Joseph A Murray; Alberto Rubio-Tapia
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.174

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.