Literature DB >> 20201102

Carotid artery stenting in high surgical risk patients using the FiberNet embolic protection system: the EPIC trial results.

Subbarao Myla1, J Michael Bacharach, Gary M Ansel, Eric J Dippel, Daniel J McCormick, Jeffrey J Popma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The multicenter EPIC (FiberNet Embolic Protection System in Carotid Artery Stenting Trial) single-arm trial evaluated the 30-day outcomes of a new design concept for embolic protection during carotid artery stenting (CAS).
BACKGROUND: Embolic protection filters available for use during CAS include fixed and over-the-wire systems that rely on embolic material capture within a "basket" structure. The FiberNet Embolic Protection System (EPS), which features a very low crossing profile, consists of a three-dimensional fiber-based filter distally mounted on a 0.014 inch guidewire with integrated aspiration during filter retrieval.
METHODS: The trial enrolled 237 patients from 26 centers. Demographics, clinical and lesion characteristics, as well as adverse events through a 30-day follow-up were recorded. The mean age of the patients was 74 years, 64% were male and 20% had symptomatic carotid artery disease.
RESULTS: The combined major adverse event (MAE) rate at 30 days for all death, stroke, and myocardial infarction was 3.0%. There were three major strokes (two ischemic and one hemorrhagic) and two minor strokes (both ischemic) for a 2.1% 30-day stroke rate. The procedural technical success rate was 97.5% and macroscopic evidence of debris was reported in 90.9% of the procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: The FiberNet EPS, used with commercially available stents, produced low stroke rates following CAS in high surgical risk patients presenting with carotid artery disease. The unique filter design including aspiration during retrieval may have contributed to the low 30-day stroke rate reported during CAS in patients considered at high risk for complications following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Copyright 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20201102     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

1.  Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

Authors:  Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Mahmoud B Malas; David J Cohen; W Charles Sternbergh; Herbert D Aronow; Mark K Eskandari; Alice J Sheffet; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  State of the art in carotid artery stenting: trial data, technical aspects, and limitations.

Authors:  Rajan A G Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Krzysztof Malinowski; Kenneth Rosenfield; Laura Capoccia; Francesco Speziale; Gianmarco de Donato; Carlo Setacci; Christian Wissgott; Pasqualino Sirignano; Lukasz Tekieli; Andrey Karpenko; Waclaw Kuczmik; Eugenio Stabile; David Christopher Metzger; Max Amor; Adnan H Siddiqui; Antonio Micari; Piotr Pieniążek; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Andrej Schmidt; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Carotid artery stenting and patient outcomes: the CABANA surveillance study.

Authors:  L Nelson Hopkins; Christopher J White; Malcolm T Foster; Richard J Powell; Gerald Zemel; Juan Diaz-Cartelle
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.